Strobel J, Rödinger M L, Reck B, Lohmann W, Wickert H
Universitäts-Augenklinik Giessen.
Ophthalmologe. 1992 Aug;89(4):278-82.
In 25 eyes with nuclear cataract, 18 eyes with posterior subcapsular cataract, 25 eyes with cortical cataract, and 23 eyes without any pathological lens changes, the maximal fluorescence intensity was determined after excitation with monochromatic light at 365 nm, 405 nm, 436 nm, and 485 nm. The coefficient of variation was smaller than 5%. All eyes with cataract underwent cataract surgery a few days after the fluorescence measurements. The fluorescence spectrometer, especially constructed for in vivo measurements, consists of a modified slit lamp (Zeiss 75 SL) and an optical multichannel analyser (OMA) for gauging the data. The clinical trial was undertaken to determine whether, considering the influence of age, there is a difference between the fluorescence intensities in eyes with the above named cataracts and noncataractous eyes. The data were analyzed to determine the effect of age upon fluorescence intensity for all excitation wavelengths in both cataractous and noncataractous eyes. Age had an influence on the fluorescence intensities for all four excitation wavelengths. Assuming that the influence of age was not dependent on the state of the lens, it was quantified for all measurements and an "age-corrected" fluorescence intensity was calculated. The statistical analyses of these "age-corrected" fluorescence intensities revealed a significant difference (P < 0.001) for all of the types of cataracts examined and for normal eyes. The cataract types examined and the normal eyes showed differences in their fluorescence feature. To assess the fluorescence intensities obtained after excitation with the wavelengths mentioned above, one must take into consideration the influence of age on the measurements.
在25只患有核性白内障的眼睛、18只患有后囊下白内障的眼睛、25只患有皮质性白内障的眼睛以及23只无任何晶状体病理改变的眼睛中,用365纳米、405纳米、436纳米和485纳米的单色光激发后测定最大荧光强度。变异系数小于5%。所有患有白内障的眼睛在荧光测量几天后均接受了白内障手术。专门为体内测量构建的荧光光谱仪由一台改良裂隙灯(蔡司75 SL)和一台用于测量数据的光学多通道分析仪(OMA)组成。进行该临床试验是为了确定,考虑到年龄的影响,上述白内障患者眼睛与非白内障患者眼睛的荧光强度之间是否存在差异。对数据进行分析,以确定年龄对白内障和非白内障眼睛在所有激发波长下荧光强度的影响。年龄对所有四个激发波长的荧光强度均有影响。假设年龄的影响不依赖于晶状体状态,则对所有测量进行量化,并计算“年龄校正”荧光强度。对这些“年龄校正”荧光强度的统计分析显示,在所检查的所有类型白内障以及正常眼睛中均存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。所检查的白内障类型和正常眼睛在荧光特征上存在差异。为了评估用上述波长激发后获得的荧光强度,必须考虑年龄对测量的影响。