Taghavy A, Hamer H, Fünfgelder J
Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen, Germany.
Int J Neurosci. 1992 Sep;66(1-2):131-41. doi: 10.3109/00207459208999797.
Out of 75 patients with TIA or PRIND we selected 9 TIAs and 6 PRINDs with normal EEGs and CCTs, full recovery of neurological function, no history of amaurosis fugax and no findings of visual impairments. PVEPs were derived from 01-02 to Fz and Cz as ground following binocular pattern reversal visual stimuli of 1.9 Hz. Interhemispheric differences of the latencies of P60, N80, P100 and of the amplitudes N80/P100 and P100/N140 were compared with the corresponding parameters of 22 age matched controls. In contrary to the latency differences the interhemispheric difference of the amplitude N80/P100 was highly significantly larger (33.5 +/- 16.0%) in patients than in the control group (12.8 +/- 9.8%) (p < or = .0005). The amplitude P100/N140 behaved the same way (p < or = .025); the amplitude of the affected side being smaller. There were no statistical differences between TIAs and PRINDs and a tendency was seen for normalization of the differences with increasing time distances between the onset of the ischemic attack and the point of time of the recordings.
在75例短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或可逆性缺血性神经功能缺损(PRIND)患者中,我们选取了9例TIA患者和6例PRIND患者,这些患者脑电图(EEG)和计算机断层扫描(CCT)结果正常,神经功能完全恢复,无一过性黑矇病史且无视力损害表现。采用1.9Hz的双眼模式反转视觉刺激,从01 - 02记录到Fz和Cz作为参考电极引出视觉诱发电位(PVEPs)。将P60、N80、P100的潜伏期以及N80/P100和P100/N140的波幅的半球间差异与22名年龄匹配的对照组的相应参数进行比较。与潜伏期差异相反,患者组N80/P100波幅的半球间差异(33.5±16.0%)显著高于对照组(12.8±9.8%)(p≤0.0005)。P100/N140波幅也表现出相同情况(p≤0.025);患侧波幅较小。TIA和PRIND之间无统计学差异,且随着缺血发作开始与记录时间点之间时间间隔的增加,差异有趋于正常化的趋势。