• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻醉学实践中针刺伤及针刺传播疾病的风险。

The risk of needlestick injuries and needlestick-transmitted diseases in the practice of anesthesiology.

作者信息

Berry A J, Greene E S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1992 Nov;77(5):1007-21. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199211000-00025.

DOI:10.1097/00000542-199211000-00025
PMID:1306064
Abstract

Anesthesiologists are at risk for acquiring blood-borne infections through contact with blood or body fluids. From prospective studies, the greatest risk of transmission is through a percutaneous exposure such as needlestick injury. Personal protective equipment such as gloves and gowns do not completely prevent these exposures. Although educational efforts can reduce the frequency of recapping of needles, they generally have not decreased the incidence of needlesticks. Therefore, in addition to practicing universal precautions, anesthesiologists can attempt to reduce their risk of needlestick injuries by eliminating nonessential unprotected needle use, through the use of needleless or protected needle devices (engineering controls) and by modifying anesthetic procedures requiring needles (work practice controls). Needleless or protected needle products are commercially available for use in many procedures performed by anesthesiologists. For tasks that require the use of needled devices, the practitioner should use safe techniques for handling (i.e., one-handed recapping if recapping is needed) and disposal (i.e., puncture-resistant containers) of these devices. Evaluation of the efficacy, cost, and safety of needleless or protected needle products should be continued as they are introduced into wider use. Additionally, anesthesiologists should be encouraged to report needlestick injuries so that appropriate postexposure treatment can be given and so that the incident can be studied to permit design of a work protocol or device to prevent similar accidents in the future.

摘要

麻醉医生有通过接触血液或体液而感染血源性疾病的风险。前瞻性研究表明,传播风险最大的途径是经皮暴露,如针刺伤。手套和手术衣等个人防护装备并不能完全防止此类暴露。尽管开展教育活动可以减少重新盖帽的频率,但总体上并未降低针刺伤的发生率。因此,除了采取普遍预防措施外,麻醉医生还可以通过消除不必要的无保护针头使用、使用无针或带保护装置的针头(工程控制)以及修改需要使用针头的麻醉操作(工作规范控制),来降低针刺伤的风险。无针或带保护装置的针头产品在市场上有销售,可供麻醉医生在许多操作中使用。对于需要使用带针装置的任务,从业者应采用安全的操作技术来处理(即如需重新盖帽则采用单手操作)和处置(即使用防穿刺容器)这些装置。随着无针或带保护装置的针头产品得到更广泛应用,应持续评估其有效性、成本和安全性。此外,应鼓励麻醉医生报告针刺伤事件,以便能给予适当的暴露后治疗,并对该事件进行研究,从而设计出工作流程或装置,以防止未来发生类似事故。

相似文献

1
The risk of needlestick injuries and needlestick-transmitted diseases in the practice of anesthesiology.麻醉学实践中针刺伤及针刺传播疾病的风险。
Anesthesiology. 1992 Nov;77(5):1007-21. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199211000-00025.
2
A five-year study of needlestick injuries: significant reduction associated with communication, education, and convenient placement of sharps containers.一项关于针刺伤的五年研究:与沟通、教育及锐器盒的便捷放置相关的显著减少。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 May;13(5):265-71. doi: 10.1086/646525.
3
Reported hospital needlestick injuries in relation to knowledge/skill, design, and management problems.报告的医院针刺伤与知识/技能、设计及管理问题的关系。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 May;13(5):259-64. doi: 10.1086/646524.
4
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.用于预防医护人员因针刺造成经皮暴露损伤的器械。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 9(3):CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub2.
5
The use of needles in the practice of anesthesiology and the effect of a needleless intravenous administration system.麻醉学实践中针头的使用及无针静脉给药系统的效果。
Anesth Analg. 1993 May;76(5):1114-9. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199305000-00034.
6
Influence of an educational program and mechanical opening needle disposal boxes on occupational needlestick injuries.一项教育计划及机械开启式针头处置盒对职业性针刺伤的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Dec;12(12):725-31. doi: 10.1086/646280.
7
Cost-effective infection control for developing world described. Nigeria.描述了发展中国家具有成本效益的感染控制措施。尼日利亚。
Infect Control Wkly. 1994 Feb 14:5-6.
8
Percutaneous injuries in anesthesia personnel.麻醉人员的经皮损伤
Anesth Analg. 1996 Aug;83(2):273-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199608000-00013.
9
Needlestick针刺伤
10
Randomized prospective study of the impact of three needleless intravenous systems on needlestick injury rates.三种无针静脉输液系统对针刺伤发生率影响的随机前瞻性研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;17(12):803-8. doi: 10.1086/647240.

引用本文的文献

1
Refocusing on work-based hazards for the anaesthesiologist in a post-pandemic era.在后疫情时代重新关注麻醉医生基于工作的危害。
BJA Open. 2023 Oct 25;8:100234. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100234. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
The use of obtuse needles in aspirating drugs from ampules in the practice of anesthesia.在麻醉实践中使用钝头针从安瓿中抽吸药物。
J Anesth. 1997 Sep;11(3):244. doi: 10.1007/BF02480049.
3
Comparison of awareness about precautions for needle stick injuries: a survey among health care workers at a tertiary care center in Pakistan.
针刺伤预防意识的比较:巴基斯坦一家三级医疗中心医护人员的调查
Patient Saf Surg. 2016 Sep 7;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13037-016-0108-7. eCollection 2016.
4
Accidental exposures to blood and body fluids among health care workers in a Referral Hospital of Cameroon.喀麦隆一家转诊医院医护人员的血液和体液意外暴露情况。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 15;9:94. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1923-8.
5
AIDS and surgery.艾滋病与外科手术。
Int Orthop. 1994;18(6):397-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00187091.