• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻醉学实践中针头的使用及无针静脉给药系统的效果。

The use of needles in the practice of anesthesiology and the effect of a needleless intravenous administration system.

作者信息

Berry A J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA 30322.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1993 May;76(5):1114-9. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199305000-00034.

DOI:10.1213/00000539-199305000-00034
PMID:8484516
Abstract

Anesthesia personnel are at risk for occupationally acquired blood-borne infections transmitted through needlestick injuries. To formulate strategies for the prevention of needlestick injuries, it is necessary to identify the types of needles used by anesthesia personnel and the devices associated with injuries. The introduction of a needleless intravenous (i.v.) administration system provided an opportunity to assess its effect on needle usage in the practice of anesthesiology. The contents of needle disposal containers placed in the preoperative holding area and five operating rooms before (control) and after the introduction of a needleless administration system (study) were categorized by needle type. The information on needles used by anesthesia personnel was compared with that on needles purchased for the entire hospital. During the control period, most of the needles used were 18-23-gauge hollow needles (51.6%), i.c. catheter stylets (23%), and 25-26-gauge small-bore hollow needles (17.1%). There was no difference in the total number of needles collected after the introduction of the needleless administration system, but there was an increase in capped 18-23-gauge hollow needles. Anesthesia personnel used a relatively greater number of small-bore hollow needles (25-26 gauge), i.v. catheters, and spinal and epidural needles, but fewer hollow needles (18-23 gauge) than were purchased for hospital-wide use. Small-bore hollow needles (25-26 gauge) were responsible for 31.6% of the 19 needlestick injuries reported by anesthesia personnel to the Employee Health Service.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

麻醉人员面临因针刺伤而职业性感染血源性病原体的风险。为制定预防针刺伤的策略,有必要确定麻醉人员使用的针具类型以及与损伤相关的器械。无针静脉给药系统的引入为评估其对麻醉实践中针具使用的影响提供了契机。在引入无针给药系统之前(对照期)和之后(研究期),对放置在术前等候区和五个手术室的针具处理容器中的内容物按针具类型进行分类。将麻醉人员使用针具的信息与全院采购针具的信息进行比较。在对照期,使用的针具大多是18 - 23号空心针(51.6%)、静脉导管芯(23%)和25 - 26号小口径空心针(17.1%)。引入无针给药系统后收集的针具总数没有差异,但带帽的18 - 23号空心针数量有所增加。麻醉人员使用的小口径空心针(25 - 26号)、静脉导管以及脊椎和硬膜外针的数量相对较多,但使用的空心针(18 - 23号)比全院采购的数量少。在麻醉人员向员工健康服务部门报告的19起针刺伤事件中,25 - 26号小口径空心针占31.6%。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
The use of needles in the practice of anesthesiology and the effect of a needleless intravenous administration system.麻醉学实践中针头的使用及无针静脉给药系统的效果。
Anesth Analg. 1993 May;76(5):1114-9. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199305000-00034.
2
Percutaneous injuries in anesthesia personnel.麻醉人员的经皮损伤
Anesth Analg. 1996 Aug;83(2):273-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199608000-00013.
3
Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.意大利医护人员针刺伤的特定器械风险
JAMA. 1994;272(8):607-10.
4
Needlesafe versus needleless intravenous injections.安全型注射器与无针静脉注射
AANA J. 1994 Aug;62(4):308-9.
5
The risk of needlestick injuries and needlestick-transmitted diseases in the practice of anesthesiology.麻醉学实践中针刺伤及针刺传播疾病的风险。
Anesthesiology. 1992 Nov;77(5):1007-21. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199211000-00025.
6
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.用于预防医护人员因针刺造成经皮暴露损伤的器械。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 9(3):CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub2.
7
Complying with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard: implementing needleless systems and intravenous safety devices.遵守职业安全与健康管理局的《血源性病原体标准》:实施无针系统和静脉安全装置。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Mar;20(3):209-214. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000117932.65522.93.
8
Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles.一家大型教学医院的针刺伤:全院更换传统空心针的显著效果
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Apr;36(3):180-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.009.
9
Microbiologic evaluation of needleless and needle-access devices.无针和带针接入装置的微生物学评估
Am J Infect Control. 1997 Oct;25(5):377-80. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90081-x.
10
Comparison of a needleless system with conventional heparin locks.无针系统与传统肝素帽的比较。
Am J Infect Control. 1993 Oct;21(5):263-9. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90419-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of obtuse needles in aspirating drugs from ampules in the practice of anesthesia.在麻醉实践中使用钝头针从安瓿中抽吸药物。
J Anesth. 1997 Sep;11(3):244. doi: 10.1007/BF02480049.