Neidhardt A, Bachour K, Costes Y
SAMU 25, Hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon.
Agressologie. 1992;33 Spec No 1:23-8.
Criteria of quality of gases and vapours supply, ventilator, patient's circle circuit and monitoring devices are recalled to help the anesthetist to choose his anesthesia machine. Advantages of compact or modular apparatus are discussed. Four, now wellknown, anesthesia machines (modulus II+, Siemens 900 D+SAC985, Roche Kontron 4300 and Engstrom Elsa) were analysed in clinical controlled ventilation and in simulated spontaneous ventilation to study the imposed work of breathing. Results are discussed with regard to safety rules and to ergonomics, bearing in mind their respective prices. Comparison is made with an original "bisontin" prototype.
回顾了气体和蒸汽供应、呼吸机、患者环路和监测设备的质量标准，以帮助麻醉师选择其麻醉机。讨论了紧凑型或模块化设备的优点。分析了四台目前知名的麻醉机（模量II +、西门子900 D + SAC985、罗氏康强4300和恩斯特龙埃尔莎）在临床控制通气和模拟自主通气中的情况，以研究呼吸的外加功。结合安全规则和人体工程学对结果进行了讨论，同时考虑到它们各自的价格。并与原始的“bisontin”原型进行了比较。
