Suppr超能文献

culdoscopy与laparoscopy输卵管绝育术的比较

Comparison of culdoscopic and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.

作者信息

Koetsawang S, Bhiraleus P, Rachawat D, Kiriwat O

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Mar 15;124(6):601-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90061-2.

Abstract

The growing number of women requesting interval sterilization (apart from term delivery or abortion procedures) necessitates the re-evaluation of traditional surgical procedures. A total of 800 women--the first 400 women undergoing culdoscopic and laparoscopic tubal sterilization procedures at Siriraj Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand--evaluate the appropriateness of the two sterilization procedures for use in interval sterilization programs. No serious operative complications occurred in either group. However, the rate of postoperative complications was considerably higher for the culdoscopic group than for the laparoscopic group. Hospitalization was required for only a small percentage of the patients and most had resumed their normal activities within two days of the operation. This study indicates that both procedures are effective and may be safely performed on an outpatient basis without general anesthetics and with minimal discomfort for the patients.

摘要

要求进行非孕期绝育(除足月分娩或流产手术外)的女性人数不断增加,这就需要对传统外科手术进行重新评估。共有800名女性——泰国曼谷诗里拉吉医院首批接受经阴道镜和腹腔镜输卵管绝育手术的400名女性——评估了这两种绝育手术在非孕期绝育项目中的适用性。两组均未发生严重手术并发症。然而,经阴道镜组的术后并发症发生率明显高于腹腔镜组。只有一小部分患者需要住院,大多数患者在术后两天内就恢复了正常活动。这项研究表明,这两种手术都是有效的,并且可以在门诊安全进行,无需全身麻醉,患者不适程度最小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验