Gotfried M H, Ellison W T
Pulmonary Associates, Phoenix, Arizona 85020.
Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):108S-113S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90320-b.
In two multicenter trials, lomefloxacin and cefaclor were compared as treatments for acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. In total, 522 adult outpatients were enrolled at 50 centers in the United States. Patients were randomized to treatment groups receiving either 400 mg lomefloxacin orally once daily (n = 259) or 250 mg cefaclor every 8 hours (n = 263) for 7-10 days. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, severity of exacerbation, smoking history, theophylline use, and baseline pathogens. The most common baseline pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae, found in 32% of patients in the lomefloxacin group and in 29% in the cefaclor group, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13% and 16%, respectively), Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis (12% and 13%), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (10% in both groups). Bacterial eradication rates 1-4 days after the completion of treatment for all patients with baseline pathogens were 81.8% in the lomefloxacin group and 62.7% in the cefaclor group (p less than 0.001). Clinical success (disappearance or improvement of presenting signs and symptoms) was noted in 80.0% of patients in the lomefloxacin group and 64.7% in the cefaclor group (p = 0.002). Eradication rates for the subgroup of patients who had pathogens susceptible in vitro to both study drugs and who completed treatment were 97.1% for lomefloxacin and 84.6% for cefaclor (p = 0.002). Clinical success rates in this subgroup were 92.4% for lomefloxacin and 90.1 for cefaclor (p = 0.585). Treatment-related adverse events were reported for 7% of patients in the lomefloxacin group and 5% in the cefaclor group. The most common adverse events in both groups were nausea and diarrhea. Six patients were withdrawn from treatment with lomefloxacin and four from the cefaclor group because of adverse events. There was no clinical or laboratory evidence of theophylline interaction with either treatment. Once-daily oral administration of 400 mg lomefloxacin was an effective, well-tolerated alternative to 250 mg of cefaclor three times daily in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
在两项多中心试验中,对洛美沙星和头孢克洛作为慢性支气管炎急性细菌性加重期的治疗药物进行了比较。在美国50个中心共招募了522名成年门诊患者。患者被随机分配至治疗组,一组每天口服一次400mg洛美沙星(n = 259),另一组每8小时口服250mg头孢克洛(n = 263),疗程为7 - 10天。两组在年龄、加重期严重程度、吸烟史、茶碱使用情况及基线病原体方面具有可比性。最常见的基线病原体为流感嗜血杆菌,在洛美沙星组32%的患者中发现,头孢克洛组为29%;铜绿假单胞菌(分别为13%和16%)、卡他莫拉菌(摩拉菌属,分别为12%和13%)以及肺炎链球菌(两组均为10%)。所有有基线病原体的患者在治疗结束后1 - 4天的细菌清除率,洛美沙星组为81.8%,头孢克洛组为62.7%(p < 0.001)。洛美沙星组80.0%的患者临床症状成功缓解(现有体征和症状消失或改善),头孢克洛组为64.7%(p = 0.002)。对于体外对两种研究药物均敏感且完成治疗的患者亚组,洛美沙星的清除率为97.1%,头孢克洛为84.6%(p = 0.002)。该亚组中洛美沙星的临床成功率为92.4%,头孢克洛为90.1%(p = 0.585)。洛美沙星组7%的患者和头孢克洛组5%的患者报告了与治疗相关的不良事件。两组最常见的不良事件为恶心和腹泻。由于不良事件,6名接受洛美沙星治疗的患者和4名接受头孢克洛治疗的患者退出研究。没有临床或实验室证据表明茶碱与任何一种治疗存在相互作用。每日一次口服400mg洛美沙星是每日三次口服250mg头孢克洛治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的一种有效且耐受性良好的替代方案。