• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

司帕沙星与氧氟沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染加重期的多中心、双盲、随机对照研究。司帕沙星多中心ABECB研究组

Sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, comparative study. Sparfloxacin Multicenter ABECB Study Group.

作者信息

DeAbate C A, Henry D, Bensch G, Jubran A, Chodosh S, Harper L, Tipping D, Talbot G H

机构信息

Medical Research Center, New Orleans, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1998 Jul;114(1):120-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.1.120.

DOI:10.1378/chest.114.1.120
PMID:9674458
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Comparison of efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB).

DESIGN

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.

SETTING

Sixty-eight private offices and outpatient clinics in the United States and Canada.

PATIENTS

Seven hundred ninety-eight adults with ABECB, as confirmed by the acute onset of new (or worsened from the immediate premorbid state) cough and sputum production.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomization 1:1 to sparfloxacin, 400 mg on day 1, then 200 mg once daily, or ofloxacin, 400 mg twice daily, with matching comparator placebos, given concurrently for 10 consecutive days.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy parameter was overall response in the bacteriologically evaluable population. Overall success rates in this population were 85.3% and 89.3% for sparfloxacin and ofloxacin, respectively. The two-sided 95% confidence interval was -9.9, 1.9, indicating that sparfloxacin was statistically equivalent to ofloxacin. The all-treated population analysis was similar to that in the evaluable population. Bacterial eradication rates were similar in both treatment groups for Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Staphylococcus aureus. The frequency of adverse events overall was comparable in the two treatment groups. The sparfloxacin group had a lower frequency of digestive and nervous system adverse events, but a higher frequency of photosensitivity reactions than the ofloxacin group.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily oral treatment with 200 mg sparfloxacin (after initial 400 mg dose) is as effective as twice-daily treatment with 400 mg ofloxacin in patients with ABECB.

摘要

研究目的

比较司帕沙星与氧氟沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染(ABECB)的疗效和安全性。

设计

多中心、双盲、随机研究。

地点

美国和加拿大的68个私人诊所和门诊。

患者

798例确诊为ABECB的成人患者,表现为新发(或较病前即刻状态加重)咳嗽和咳痰急性发作。

干预措施

按1:1随机分为司帕沙星组(第1天400mg,之后每日1次200mg)或氧氟沙星组(每日2次,每次400mg),同时给予匹配的对照安慰剂,连续给药10天。

结果

主要疗效参数是细菌学可评估人群的总体反应。该人群中司帕沙星和氧氟沙星的总体成功率分别为85.3%和89.3%。双侧95%置信区间为-9.9, 1.9,表明司帕沙星在统计学上与氧氟沙星等效。全治疗人群分析与可评估人群相似。流感嗜血杆菌、肺炎链球菌、卡他莫拉菌、肺炎衣原体、副流感嗜血杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、阴沟肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌在两个治疗组中的细菌清除率相似。两个治疗组总体不良事件发生率相当。司帕沙星组消化和神经系统不良事件发生率较低,但光敏反应发生率高于氧氟沙星组。

结论

对于ABECB患者,司帕沙星初始剂量400mg后每日1次口服200mg与氧氟沙星每日2次口服400mg疗效相当。

相似文献

1
Sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, comparative study. Sparfloxacin Multicenter ABECB Study Group.司帕沙星与氧氟沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染加重期的多中心、双盲、随机对照研究。司帕沙星多中心ABECB研究组
Chest. 1998 Jul;114(1):120-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.1.120.
2
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with grepafloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.格帕沙星短程疗法(5天)治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的疗效
Clin Ther. 1999 Jan;21(1):172-88. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88277-6.
3
Comparative safety and efficacy of sparfloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind, randomised, parallel, multicentre study.司帕沙星治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的比较安全性和疗效:一项双盲、随机、平行、多中心研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:93-104. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.93.
4
Treating acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in patients unresponsive to previous therapy: sparfloxacin versus clarithromycin.治疗对先前治疗无反应的慢性支气管炎患者的急性细菌性加重:司帕沙星与克拉霉素对比
Clin Ther. 1999 Jun;21(6):954-65. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(99)80017-4.
5
Randomized, double-blind study of grepafloxacin versus amoxycillin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Dec;40 Suppl A:63-72. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.suppl_1.63.
6
Randomized, double-blind study of short-course (5 day) grepafloxacin versus 10 day clarithromycin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.短期(5天)格帕沙星与10天克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的随机双盲研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Oct;44(4):515-23. doi: 10.1093/jac/44.4.515.
7
Efficacy and safety of a 10-day course of 400 or 600 milligrams of grepafloxacin once daily for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: comparison with a 10-day course of 500 milligrams of ciprofloxacin twice daily.每日一次服用400毫克或600毫克格帕沙星,疗程为10天,用于治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的疗效和安全性:与每日两次服用500毫克环丙沙星,疗程为10天进行比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Jan;42(1):114-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.1.114.
8
Treatment of community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection with sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin. The Sparfloxacin Multi Center UUTI Study Group.司帕沙星与氧氟沙星治疗社区获得性急性单纯性尿路感染。司帕沙星多中心泌尿道感染研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Sep;42(9):2262-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.9.2262.
9
Safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.洛美沙星与头孢克洛治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的安全性与疗效比较
Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):108S-113S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90320-b.
10
Levofloxacin and sparfloxacin: new quinolone antibiotics.左氧氟沙星和司帕沙星:新型喹诺酮类抗生素。
Ann Pharmacother. 1998 Mar;32(3):320-36. doi: 10.1345/aph.17178.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomised double-blind comparison of oral gatifloxacin and co-amoxiclav for acute exacerbation of chronic Bronchitis.口服加替沙星与阿莫西林克拉维酸钾治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的随机双盲对照研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Mar;22(3):144-50. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-0897-3. Epub 2003 Mar 5.
2
[Use of antibiotics in exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[抗生素在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的应用]
Aten Primaria. 2001 Oct 15;28(6):415-24. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70405-2.
3
Bacterial infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2000: a state-of-the-art review.
2000年慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的细菌感染:最新综述
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):336-63. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.336-363.2001.
4
Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: what role for the new fluoroquinolones?慢性支气管炎急性加重:新型氟喹诺酮类药物有何作用?
Drugs Aging. 2001;18(1):1-11. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118010-00001.
5
Activity of quinolones against Chlamydia pneumoniae.喹诺酮类药物对肺炎衣原体的活性。
Drugs. 1999;58 Suppl 2:78-81. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958002-00015.
6
Potential interactions of the extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones with the CNS.广谱氟喹诺酮类药物与中枢神经系统的潜在相互作用。
Drug Saf. 1999 Aug;21(2):123-35. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199921020-00005.