Suppr超能文献

每日一次芦氟沙星与每日三次阿莫西林治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期门诊患者的双盲对照研究。

Double-blind, comparative study of rufloxacin once daily versus amoxicillin three times a day in treatment of outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Klietmann W, Cesana M, Rondel R K, Focht J

机构信息

Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Moers, Germany.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Nov;37(11):2298-306. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.11.2298.

Abstract

In a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of two dosage schedules of rufloxacin once daily were compared with those of amoxicillin three times a day in the treatment of 192 outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Rufloxacin was given as a single oral dose of 400 mg on day 1 and single daily doses of 200 mg on the subsequent 9 days (n = 64) or as 300 mg on day 1 and then 150 mg daily for 9 days (n = 63); amoxicillin was given as 500 mg orally three times a day for 10 days (n = 65). Clinical and bacteriological assessments were carried out before treatment, between study days 3 and 5, and at days 1 and 8 after treatment. Pretreatment cultures were positive for 139 patients, the most frequently isolated pathogens being Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae. Clinical success rates were comparable in the three groups (94, 95, and 98%, respectively), as were bacteriological success rates at the end of treatment (93, 95, and 91%, respectively) and at follow-up (88, 95, and 98%, respectively). The power to detect a significant 15% difference in cure rates was 74.9%. Follow-up bacteriological failures from pneumococcal infection were 18% in both rufloxacin groups combined and 5% in the amoxicillin group. The 200-mg dose regimen achieved average steady-state concentrations in plasma higher than did the 150-mg dose regimen (3.75 versus 2.72 micrograms/ml). Adverse events occurred in 11 and 13 patients, respectively, on rufloxacin and 8 on amoxicillin. This study shows that rufloxacin once daily ay be a possible option for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 200-mg daily oral dose preceeded by a loading dose of 400 mg displays a better pharmacokinetic profile than the lower dose.

摘要

在一项双盲、随机、多中心研究中,将每日一次服用两种剂量方案的芦氟沙星与每日三次服用阿莫西林的疗效和安全性进行了比较,以治疗192例慢性支气管炎急性加重的门诊患者。芦氟沙星在第1天口服单剂量400mg,随后9天每日单剂量200mg(n = 64),或在第1天服用300mg,然后连续9天每日服用150mg(n = 63);阿莫西林每日口服500mg,每日三次,共10天(n = 65)。在治疗前、研究第3至5天以及治疗后第1天和第8天进行临床和细菌学评估。139例患者的治疗前培养结果呈阳性,最常分离出的病原体为肺炎链球菌、卡他莫拉菌和流感嗜血杆菌。三组的临床成功率相当(分别为94%、95%和98%),治疗结束时的细菌学成功率(分别为93%、95%和91%)以及随访时的成功率(分别为88%、95%和98%)也是如此。检测治愈率有显著15%差异的效能为74.9%。芦氟沙星两组合并的肺炎球菌感染随访细菌学失败率为18%,阿莫西林组为5%。200mg剂量方案在血浆中达到的平均稳态浓度高于150mg剂量方案(3.75对2.72μg/ml)。服用芦氟沙星的患者分别有11例和13例发生不良事件,服用阿莫西林的有8例。本研究表明,每日一次服用芦氟沙星可能是治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的一种选择。每日口服200mg且首剂为400mg的剂量方案比低剂量方案显示出更好的药代动力学特征。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
5
Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics.肺炎球菌对抗生素的耐药性。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Apr;3(2):171-96. doi: 10.1128/CMR.3.2.171.
6
Treatment of Branhamella catarrhalis infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Jan;25(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/25.1.1.
9
Chemotherapy for infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae: current problems and future prospects.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Jan;27(1):3-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.1.3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验