Hambye A S, Merlo P, Hermans J, Bodart F, Beauduin M, Gilbeau J P
Service of Nuclear Medecine and Oncology, Hôpital de Jolimont, Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium.
Nucl Med Commun. 1992 Jul;13(7):488-93. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199207000-00002.
Measurement of kidney depths using computed axial tomographic (CAT) scans, considered as the gold standard, has been compared in 25 patients with depth measured using an isotopic method (99Tcm-DMSA). 99Tcm-DMSA underestimates renal depth in 78% of the cases (mean underestimation: 0.78 cm). The correlation coefficient between the two methods is 0.82. As a comparison, kidney depths calculated using Tonnesen's formula are also given and related to CAT scan results. The presence of renal morphological abnormalities in 18% of the studied kidneys allowed the authors to study their potential influence on 99TcmDMSA measurements. They do not seem to be very different from those obtained in morphologically normal kidneys. The different methods for kidney depth measurement described in the literature are briefly reviewed.
使用计算机轴向断层扫描(CAT)测量肾脏深度被视为金标准,本研究对25例患者采用同位素方法(99锝-二巯基丁二酸,99Tcm-DMSA)测量的深度与CAT扫描测量结果进行了比较。在78%的病例中,99Tcm-DMSA低估了肾脏深度(平均低估0.78厘米)。两种方法之间的相关系数为0.82。作为对比,还给出了使用托内森公式计算的肾脏深度,并与CAT扫描结果进行了关联。18%的被研究肾脏存在形态学异常,这使作者能够研究其对99Tcm-DMSA测量结果的潜在影响。这些结果似乎与形态学正常的肾脏所获得的结果没有太大差异。本文简要回顾了文献中描述的不同肾脏深度测量方法。