Laitinen J
Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y). 1976 Summer;4(2):169-75. doi: 10.1142/s0192415x76000214.
A comparison was made between 50 patients treated with acupuncture and 50 patients treated with transcutaneous electric stimulation. All patients suffered from chronic sacrolumbalgia or ischialgia of more than six months' duration. Two to 10 treatments were given at weekly sessions, the mean being 5 in both groups. Stimulation points were selected by the same principle in both groups: one point along the course of the nerve trunk affected, and one point at a dermatome proximal to the affected segment. The stimulation was given bilaterally. Needles were inserted as deep as the muscular layer and twirled at 5 min intervals. In the electric stimulation square-wave impulses of 1.0 msec duration and 50 Hz frequency were used. The electrodes were 0.9 cm in diameter. Each acupuncture and electric stimulation was of 20 min duration. Pain relief was complete or moderate in the acupuncture group in 58% of the cases, and in 46% in the electric stimulation group. After 2 months 30 patients in the acupuncture group and 23 patients in the electric stimulation group still reported satisfactory relief of pain. After 6 months 15 patients in the acupuncture group and 10 patients in the electric stimulation group still reported satisfactory relief of pain.
对50例接受针灸治疗的患者和50例接受经皮电刺激治疗的患者进行了比较。所有患者均患有持续超过6个月的慢性腰骶部疼痛或坐骨神经痛。两组均每周进行2至10次治疗,两组的平均治疗次数均为5次。两组均按照相同原则选择刺激点:一个沿着受影响神经干的走行选取,另一个在受影响节段近端的皮节选取。双侧进行刺激。针刺深度达肌肉层,并每隔5分钟捻转一次。经皮电刺激采用持续时间为1.0毫秒、频率为50赫兹的方波脉冲。电极直径为0.9厘米。每次针灸和电刺激持续20分钟。针灸组58%的病例疼痛完全缓解或部分缓解,电刺激组为46%。2个月后,针灸组30例患者和电刺激组23例患者仍报告疼痛得到满意缓解。6个月后,针灸组15例患者和电刺激组10例患者仍报告疼痛得到满意缓解。