La Regina M, Woods L, Klender P, Gaertner D J, Paturzo F X
Department of Comparative Medicine, St. Louis University School of Medicine, MO 63104.
Lab Anim Sci. 1992 Aug;42(4):344-6.
Thirty mice and six rats were exposed through handling, soiled bedding, or close contact to rats previously inoculated with sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV). All exposed rats developed coronaviral antibody without clinical signs or lesions of SDAV infection. Exposed mice had no lesions or clinical signs of coronavirus infection. Mice exposed by handling or by soiled bedding did not develop coronavirus antibody. Two of 10 mice exposed to SDAV-inoculated rats by close contact were coronavirus seropositive when tested 3 weeks postexposure. SDAV-inoculated rats and mice developed coronavirus lesions and antibody. These results suggest that rat-to-rat transmission of SDAV is likely via fomites or handling; however, rat-to-mouse transmission is unlikely when animals are housed and husbanded using modern techniques. Results also suggest that coronavirus antibody in mice is due to exposure to mouse coronavirus and not to rat coronaviruses.
通过接触、接触脏垫料或与先前接种唾液腺炎病毒(SDAV)的大鼠密切接触,使30只小鼠和6只大鼠暴露。所有暴露的大鼠都产生了冠状病毒抗体,但没有SDAV感染的临床症状或病变。暴露的小鼠没有冠状病毒感染的病变或临床症状。通过接触或接触脏垫料暴露的小鼠没有产生冠状病毒抗体。在暴露3周后进行检测时,10只通过与接种SDAV的大鼠密切接触而暴露的小鼠中有2只冠状病毒血清呈阳性。接种SDAV的大鼠和小鼠出现了冠状病毒病变并产生了抗体。这些结果表明,SDAV在大鼠之间的传播可能是通过污染物或接触;然而,当使用现代技术饲养动物时,大鼠向小鼠的传播不太可能发生。结果还表明,小鼠体内的冠状病毒抗体是由于接触小鼠冠状病毒而非大鼠冠状病毒所致。