Jones A L, Lee G J, Bosanquet N
Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, U.K.
Eur J Cancer. 1992;29A(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90575-z.
The study examined the budgetary implications of using 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3RA), granisetron or ondansetron, in the management of chemotherapy-induced emesis (CIE). A treatment model was constructed to represent a baseline of efficacy and costs for treating a cohort of patients with conventional antiemetics. Groups of patients who would be expected to receive the most benefit from 5-HT3RA were then identified and the effect upon costs of using these compounds in a consecutively larger proportion of selected patients was calculated. On the basis of illustrative costs from The Cookridge Hospital in the UK, it was concluded that the new antiemetics can be used in acute emesis with substantial clinical benefit for an increase of 3-10% to total treatment costs. However, for delayed emesis these compounds have not yet shown a clinical advantage, and the increase in total costs of 12-34% is not justified.
该研究考察了使用5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂(5-HT3RA)、格拉司琼或昂丹司琼治疗化疗引起的呕吐(CIE)的预算影响。构建了一个治疗模型,以代表使用传统止吐药治疗一组患者的疗效和成本基线。然后确定预计能从5-HT3RA中获益最多的患者组,并计算在选定患者中连续增加使用这些药物的比例对成本的影响。根据英国库克瑞治医院的说明性成本得出结论,新型止吐药可用于急性呕吐,对总治疗成本增加3%-10%有显著临床益处。然而,对于迟发性呕吐,这些药物尚未显示出临床优势,总成本增加12%-34%是不合理的。