• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

托烷司琼、昂丹司琼和格拉司琼用于控制土耳其癌症患者化疗引起的呕吐:疗效、副作用及成本比较

Tropisetron, ondansetron, and granisetron for control of chemotherapy-induced emesis in Turkish cancer patients: a comparison of efficacy, side-effect profile, and cost.

作者信息

Abali Hüseyin, Celik Ismail

机构信息

S.B. Ankara Numune Hastanesi Medikal Onkoloji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Cancer Invest. 2007 Apr-May;25(3):135-9. doi: 10.1080/07357900701208709.

DOI:10.1080/07357900701208709
PMID:17530482
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tropisetron, ondansetron, and granisetron are considered equally efficacious, supported by several international studies. However, there are interindividual variations in their metabolism that could affect efficacy. The clustering of such variations may change from one to another nation. Therefore, their equality must be validated in Turkish patients. The aim of this study was to compare their efficacies, side-effect profiles, and costs in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by moderate to high emetogenic chemotherapies.

METHODS

A total of 158 patients with a median age of 48 years, 115 (72.8 percent) female and 43 (27.2 percent) male, were included, respectively. Fifty-one, 61, and 46 patients were allocated to tropisetron (5 mg), ondansetron (8 mg), and granisetron (3 mg IV) in combination with 8 mg dexamethasone, which were continued 5 mg once a day, 8 mg b.i.d. and 1 mg b.i.d. PO for 5 days, respectively.

RESULTS

The complete response (CR) rates in the control of acute emesis were 80.4 percent with tropisetron, 72.1 percent with ondansetron, and 71.7 percent granisetron (p = 0.877). CR rates in delayed emesis (Days 2-5) were 68.6 percent, 68.9 percent, and 76.1 percent, respectively (p = 0.527). Rates of freedom from nausea in the same period were 37.3 percent, 35.9 percent, and 33.9 percent (p = 0.949). Nausea control rates, side-effect profile did not differ. However, headache seemed to be encountered higher (45.6 percent) in Turkish patients than others (3.9-9 percent). Tropisetron is the least expensive one ($95.3 per cycle) according to current prices in Turkey.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences among the 3 serotonin antagonists with respect to efficacy and frequency of side-effects in our patients. Tropisetron is the least expensive at current prices. The choice may be based on other parameters, such as ease of administration and patient preference.

摘要

背景

多项国际研究表明,托烷司琼、昂丹司琼和格拉司琼的疗效相当。然而,它们在代谢方面存在个体差异,这可能会影响疗效。这种差异的聚类情况在不同国家可能有所不同。因此,有必要在土耳其患者中验证它们的等效性。本研究旨在比较它们在预防中高度致吐性化疗引起的呕吐方面的疗效、副作用谱和成本。

方法

共纳入年龄中位数为48岁的158例患者,其中女性115例(72.8%),男性43例(27.2%)。51例、61例和46例患者分别被分配接受托烷司琼(5mg)、昂丹司琼(8mg)和格拉司琼(3mg静脉注射)联合8mg地塞米松治疗,分别持续每日一次5mg、每日两次8mg和每日两次口服1mg,共5天。

结果

在控制急性呕吐方面,托烷司琼的完全缓解(CR)率为80.4%,昂丹司琼为72.1%,格拉司琼为71.7%(p = 0.877)。延迟性呕吐(第2 - 5天)的CR率分别为68.6%、68.9%和76.1%(p = 0.527)。同期无恶心发生率分别为37.3%、35.9%和33.9%(p = 0.949)。恶心控制率、副作用谱无差异。然而,土耳其患者中头痛的发生率似乎较高(45.6%),高于其他患者(3.9% - 9%)。根据土耳其目前的价格,托烷司琼是最便宜的一种(每周期95.3美元)。

结论

在我们的患者中,这三种5 - 羟色胺拮抗剂在疗效和副作用发生频率方面没有差异。按照目前的价格,托烷司琼最便宜。选择可能基于其他参数,如给药便利性和患者偏好。

相似文献

1
Tropisetron, ondansetron, and granisetron for control of chemotherapy-induced emesis in Turkish cancer patients: a comparison of efficacy, side-effect profile, and cost.托烷司琼、昂丹司琼和格拉司琼用于控制土耳其癌症患者化疗引起的呕吐:疗效、副作用及成本比较
Cancer Invest. 2007 Apr-May;25(3):135-9. doi: 10.1080/07357900701208709.
2
Antiemetic efficacy of three serotonin antagonists during high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in malignant lymphoma.三种5-羟色胺拮抗剂在恶性淋巴瘤大剂量化疗及自体干细胞移植过程中的止吐疗效
Neoplasma. 2000;47(5):319-22.
3
Comparison of granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin for the treatment of head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial.格拉司琼、昂丹司琼和托烷司琼预防顺铂治疗头颈癌引起的急性恶心和呕吐的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer. 1996 Mar 1;77(5):941-8.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oral granisetron plus dexamethasone with intravenous ondansetron plus dexamethasone to control nausea and vomiting induced by moderate/severe emetogenic chemotherapy.口服格拉司琼加地塞米松与静脉注射昂丹司琼加地塞米松控制中/重度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效及安全性比较。
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000 Oct;63(10):729-36.
5
Double-blind comparative trial of oral ondansetron versus oral granisetron versus IV ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with highly emetogenic preparative regimens prior to stem cell transplantation.口服昂丹司琼、口服格拉司琼与静脉注射昂丹司琼预防干细胞移植前高致吐性预处理方案相关恶心和呕吐的双盲对照试验。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(11):596-603. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2001.v7.pm11760147.
6
Comparable safety and antiemetic efficacy of a brief (30-second bolus) intravenous granisetron infusion and a standard (15-minute) intravenous ondansetron infusion in breast cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.在接受中度致吐性化疗的乳腺癌患者中,短暂(30秒推注)静脉注射格拉司琼与标准(15分钟)静脉注射昂丹司琼的安全性和止吐疗效相当。
Cancer J Sci Am. 1998 Jan-Feb;4(1):52-8.
7
Safety and efficacy of a continuous infusion, patient-controlled antiemetic pump for children receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.用于接受致吐性化疗的儿童的持续输注、患者自控式止吐泵的安全性和有效性。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Mar;48(3):330-2. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20711.
8
Randomised double blind crossover study comparing ondansetron, granisetron and tropisetron. A cost-benefit analysis.比较昂丹司琼、格拉司琼和托烷司琼的随机双盲交叉研究。成本效益分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2000 Jul;8(4):323-33. doi: 10.1007/s005209900120.
9
A study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron in combination with dexamethasone in the prevention of delayed platinum-induced nausea and emesis.一项评估托烷司琼联合地塞米松预防铂类药物所致迟发性恶心和呕吐的疗效及耐受性的研究。
Cancer. 1998 Sep 1;83(5):1022-32.
10
Comparative efficacy of three 5-HT3 antagonists (granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron) plus dexamethasone for the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis: a randomized crossover study.三种5-羟色胺3拮抗剂(格拉司琼、昂丹司琼和托烷司琼)联合地塞米松预防顺铂所致急性呕吐的疗效比较:一项随机交叉研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2000 Apr;23(2):185-91. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200004000-00016.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis.成人止吐药预防中度或高度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):CD012775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012775.pub2.
2
PharmGKB summary: Ondansetron and tropisetron pathways, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.药物基因组学知识库总结:昂丹司琼和托烷司琼的作用途径、药代动力学和药效学。
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 Jun;29(4):91-97. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000369.
3
The Impact of 5-HT3RA Use on Cost and Utilization in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Systematic Review of the Literature.
5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂用于化疗引起的恶心和呕吐患者的成本及使用情况影响:文献系统综述
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2014 May;7(3):171-82.
4
Exploring Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities through Multivariate Projection of Risk Factors: Prediction of Nausea and Vomiting.通过风险因素的多元投影探索化疗诱导的毒性:恶心和呕吐的预测。
Toxicol Res. 2012 Jun;28(2):81-91. doi: 10.5487/TR.2012.28.2.081.
5
Anti-emetic drugs in oncology: pharmacology and individualization by pharmacogenetics.肿瘤学中的止吐药物:药物遗传学的药理学和个体化。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Feb;33(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9454-1. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
6
Curcumin reduced the side effects of mitomycin C by inhibiting GRP58-mediated DNA cross-linking in MCF-7 breast cancer xenografts.姜黄素通过抑制GRP58介导的DNA交联,减少了丝裂霉素C在MCF-7乳腺癌异种移植模型中的副作用。
Cancer Sci. 2009 Nov;100(11):2040-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01297.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
7
The efficacy and safety of palonosetron compared with granisetron in preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced vomiting in the Chinese cancer patients: a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, comparative clinical trial.在中国癌症患者中,帕洛诺司琼与格拉司琼预防高致吐性化疗引起呕吐的疗效和安全性比较:一项II期、多中心、随机、双盲、平行、对照临床试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jan;17(1):99-102. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0503-4. Epub 2008 Sep 30.