Leino M, Ennevaara K, Latvala A L, Nordgren P, Posti A M, Suves R, Takalo E
Department of Ophthalmology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1992 Oct;22(10):929-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb02066.x.
A 4 week, multicentre, double-blind, double dummy, placebo controlled group comparative study was carried out during the birch pollen season to compare the efficacy and tolerability of 2% nedocromil sodium eye drops (twice daily) and 2% sodium cromoglycate eye drops (four times daily). Participants with a history of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) were randomized to receive nedocromil sodium (60), sodium cromoglycate (61) or placebo (64). Clinical assessment of SAC showed improvement with both active treatments compared to placebo but symptomatology was low and only changes in photophobia and grittiness reached significance (P < 0.05). Patient diaries showed significant control of itching by both active treatments, compared to placebo, with no differences between the active preparations. Patients' opinions indicated a marked placebo effect: 73% of this group reported full or moderate control of symptoms, compared with 75% in sodium cromoglycate and 80% in the nedocromil sodium group. Unusual symptoms were most common (27 patients) with nedocromil sodium eye drops: P < 0.05 vs. placebo (15 patients). There were no serious adverse events. Nedocromil sodium eye drops (b.d.) and sodium cromoglycate eye drops (q.i.d.) were both considered clinically more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms of SAC due to birch pollen.
在桦树花粉季节进行了一项为期4周的多中心、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照的分组比较研究,以比较2%奈多罗米钠滴眼液(每日两次)和2%色甘酸钠滴眼液(每日四次)的疗效和耐受性。有季节性过敏性结膜炎(SAC)病史的参与者被随机分为接受奈多罗米钠(60例)、色甘酸钠(61例)或安慰剂(64例)。与安慰剂相比,两种活性治疗均使SAC的临床评估有所改善,但症状较轻,仅畏光和眼部异物感的变化具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。患者日记显示,与安慰剂相比,两种活性治疗均能显著控制瘙痒,活性制剂之间无差异。患者的意见表明存在明显的安慰剂效应:该组73%的患者报告症状完全或中度得到控制,色甘酸钠组为75%,奈多罗米钠组为80%。使用奈多罗米钠滴眼液出现异常症状的情况最为常见(27例患者):与安慰剂组(15例患者)相比,P<0.05。未发生严重不良事件。在控制桦树花粉引起的SAC症状方面,奈多罗米钠滴眼液(每日两次)和色甘酸钠滴眼液(每日四次)在临床上均被认为比安慰剂更有效。