Suppr超能文献

通过抽搐插值法评估人体膈肌和肢体肌肉的中枢及外周疲劳。

Central and peripheral fatigue of human diaphragm and limb muscles assessed by twitch interpolation.

作者信息

McKenzie D K, Bigland-Ritchie B, Gorman R B, Gandevia S C

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Physiol. 1992 Aug;454:643-56. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019284.

Abstract
  1. This study used a sensitive modification of the twitch interpolation technique to compare the extent of voluntary neural drive to the diaphragm and the elbow flexors during fatigue. For the diaphragm both inspiratory and expulsive efforts were tested, and fatigue was induced by expulsive efforts which were either maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs, 10 s duration, 50% duty cycle) or submaximal contractions (50% MVC, 3 s duration, 60% duty cycle). 2. Over the series of thirty MVCs peak elbow torque declined to 57.9 +/- 3.0% (mean +/- S.E.M.) of the initial value while maximal inspiratory pressure declined to 78.7 +/- 7.3% (P < 0.05). For the diaphragm the relative decline in voluntary peak inspiratory (and expulsive) force was similar to the decline in twitch responses to single and twin (10 ms interval) stimuli. However, for the elbow flexors the decline in twitch force was disproportionately greater than the decline in maximal voluntary force. The decline in twitch force for the diaphragm could not be attributed to failure at the neuromuscular junction. 3. At the start of the exercise, twitch potentiation (following three brief MVCs) was significantly less for the diaphragm than for the elbow flexors (20% versus 61%, P < 0.01). 4. In the unfatigued state maximal voluntary efforts by subjects activated 98.4 +/- 0.4% of the stimulated elbow flexors compared with 95.0 +/- 1.5% of the diaphragm (P < 0.05). During the exercise period there was a progressive failure in the ability to activate the limb muscle ('central fatigue'; voluntary drive declined from 98.4 +/- 0.4 to 86.8 +/- 2.2%, P < 0.01) whereas the decline in voluntary activation during inspiratory contractions was not significant (from 95.0 +/- 15 to 91.5 +/- 2.5%). 5. Voluntary activation during attempted maximal efforts was less complete for both muscles when stimuli were delivered without warning. The index of voluntary activation for unwarned stimuli was lower for the diaphragm (performing expulsive efforts, 81.0 +/- 2.8%) than for the limb muscle (89.9 +/- 1.5%, P < 0.01). 6. During repeated submaximal expulsive efforts we confirmed that subjects develop a marked inability to contract the diaphragm voluntarily, but when the diaphragm performed inspiratory manoeuvres at the same level of contractile fatigue, the index of voluntary drive was greater than 94%. 7. In conclusion, when tested with inspiratory efforts the diaphragm developed less central fatigue than the limb muscle over the same exercise period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 本研究采用了对颤搐插值技术的一种灵敏改良方法,以比较疲劳期间膈神经和肘屈肌的自主神经驱动程度。对于膈,测试了吸气和呼气努力,通过持续10秒、占空比50%的最大自主收缩(MVC)或持续3秒、占空比60%的次最大收缩进行呼气努力来诱发疲劳。2. 在这一系列30次MVC中,肘峰值扭矩降至初始值的57.9±3.0%(平均值±标准误),而最大吸气压力降至78.7±7.3%(P<0.05)。对于膈,自主峰值吸气(和呼气)力的相对下降与对单次和双次(间隔10毫秒)刺激的颤搐反应下降相似。然而,对于肘屈肌,颤搐力的下降比最大自主力的下降明显更大。膈颤搐力的下降不能归因于神经肌肉接头处的功能障碍。3. 在运动开始时,膈的颤搐增强(在三次短暂MVC之后)明显低于肘屈肌(20%对61%,P<0.01)。4. 在未疲劳状态下,受试者的最大自主努力激活了98.4±0.4%的受刺激肘屈肌,而膈为95.0±1.5%(P<0.05)。在运动期间,激活肢体肌肉的能力逐渐下降(“中枢性疲劳”;自主驱动从98.4±0.4%降至86.8±2.2%,P<0.01),而吸气收缩期间自主激活的下降不显著(从95.0±1.5%降至91.5±2.5%)。5. 当无预警地给予刺激时,两种肌肉在试图进行最大努力时的自主激活都不那么完全。膈(进行呼气努力)对无预警刺激的自主激活指数低于肢体肌肉(81.0±2.8%对89.9±1.5%,P<0.01)。6. 在重复的次最大呼气努力期间,我们证实受试者明显无法自主收缩膈,但当膈在相同程度的收缩疲劳下进行吸气动作时,自主驱动指数大于94%。7. 总之,在相同运动期间,当通过吸气努力进行测试时,膈产生的中枢性疲劳比肢体肌肉少。(摘要截短至400字)
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef32/1175625/4025b0d91ea5/jphysiol00428-0645-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验