Suppr超能文献

配对皮质脊髓运动神经元刺激对颈脊髓损伤患者最大自主屈肘的影响:一项实验研究。

The effect of paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation on maximal voluntary elbow flexion in cervical spinal cord injury: an experimental study.

机构信息

Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.

University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2019 Sep;57(9):796-804. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0291-3. Epub 2019 May 13.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Randomised, controlled, crossover study.

OBJECTIVES

Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS) involves repeatedly pairing stimuli to corticospinal neurones and motoneurones to induce changes in corticospinal transmission. Here, we examined whether PCMS could enhance maximal voluntary elbow flexion in people with cervical spinal cord injury.

SETTING

Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.

METHODS

PCMS comprised 100 pairs of transcranial magnetic and electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (0.1 Hz), timed so corticospinal potentials arrived at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses 1.5 ms before antidromic motoneuronal potentials. On two separate days, sets of five maximal elbow flexions were performed by 11 individuals with weak elbow flexors post C4 or C5 spinal cord injury before and after PCMS or control (100 peripheral nerve stimuli) conditioning. During contractions, supramaximal biceps brachii stimulation elicited superimposed twitches, which were expressed as a proportion of resting twitches to give maximal voluntary activation. Maximal torque and electromyographic activity were also assessed.

RESULTS

Baseline median (range) maximal torque was 11 Nm (6-41 Nm) and voluntary activation was 92% (62-99%). Linear mixed modelling revealed no significant differences between PCMS and control protocols after conditioning (maximal torque: p = 0.87, superimposed twitch: p = 0.87, resting twitch: p = 0.44, voluntary activation: p = 0.36, biceps EMG: p = 0.25, brachioradialis EMG: 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Possible explanations for the lack of effect include a potential ceiling effect for voluntary activation, or that PCMS may be less effective for elbow flexors than distal muscles. Despite results, previous studies suggest that PCMS is worthy of further investigation.

摘要

研究设计

随机、对照、交叉研究。

目的

成对皮质脊髓运动神经元刺激(PCMS)涉及反复配对刺激皮质脊髓神经元和运动神经元,以诱导皮质脊髓传递的变化。在这里,我们研究了 PCMS 是否可以增强颈脊髓损伤患者的最大自主肘屈。

设置

澳大利亚神经科学研究所,悉尼,澳大利亚。

方法

PCMS 由 100 对经颅磁和电外周神经刺激(0.1 Hz)组成,定时使皮质脊髓电位在逆行运动神经元电位到达皮质脊髓运动神经元突触前 1.5 ms。在两天的时间里,11 名 C4 或 C5 脊髓损伤后弱肘屈肌的患者在 PCMS 或对照(100 个外周神经刺激)条件前后分别进行了五组最大肘部屈曲。在收缩过程中,肱二头肌的超强刺激产生叠加抽搐,以静息抽搐的比例表示最大自主激活。还评估了最大扭矩和肌电图活动。

结果

基线中位数(范围)最大扭矩为 11 Nm(6-41 Nm),自愿激活率为 92%(62-99%)。线性混合模型显示,条件后 PCMS 和对照方案之间没有显著差异(最大扭矩:p = 0.87,叠加抽搐:p = 0.87,静息抽搐:p = 0.44,自愿激活:p = 0.36,肱二头肌 EMG:p = 0.25,肱桡肌 EMG:0.67)。

结论

缺乏效果的可能解释包括自愿激活的潜在上限效应,或者 PCMS 对肘屈肌的效果可能不如远端肌肉。尽管结果如此,先前的研究表明,PCMS 值得进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验