• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Oral cephalosporins.

作者信息

Verhaegen J, Verbist L

机构信息

Department of Bacteriology, U.Z. St Rafaël, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Clin Belg. 1992;47(6):377-86. doi: 10.1080/17843286.1992.11718259.

DOI:10.1080/17843286.1992.11718259
PMID:1337810
Abstract

The arrival of new cephalosporins faces the clinician with an evergrowing confusion as to the drug of choice. The older agents (cephalexin, cephradine, cefadroxil and cefaclor) and the newer formulations cefatrizine and cefuroxime axetil are intensively used for treatment of mild and moderate infections. The oldest agents have a better pharmacokinetic profile but are less active against Gram-positives and Gram-negatives. Cefaclor, cefatrizine and cefuroxime axetil have improved in vitro activity against H. influenzae and/or against S. aureus and M. catarrhalis. However the mean free serum concentrations after proposed standard daily doses of cefaclor (3 x 250 mg/d), cefatrizine (2 x 500 mg/d) and cefuroxime-axetil (2 x 250 mg/d) are lower than those of the older cephalosporins. In comparison amoxicillin-clavulanate is equally efficacious, has a more reliable pharmacokinetic profile and is less expensive than cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil in a comparable dose (e.g. 3 x 500 mg/d).

摘要

相似文献

1
Oral cephalosporins.
Acta Clin Belg. 1992;47(6):377-86. doi: 10.1080/17843286.1992.11718259.
2
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with cefuroxime axetil in treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯短程疗法(5天)治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Nov;39(11):2528-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2528.
3
Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.头孢丙烯。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力的综述。
Drugs. 1993 Feb;45(2):295-317. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345020-00008.
4
Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染患者的临床比较
Clin Ther. 1995 Sep-Oct;17(5):861-74. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80064-6.
5
Efficacy and safety of cefprozil versus other beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.头孢丙烯与其他β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效及安全性比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):851-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02111352.
6
Comparison of oral cefuroxime axetil and oral amoxycillin/clavulanate in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.口服头孢呋辛酯与口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Mar;37(3):555-64. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.3.555.
7
Cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of uncomplicated UTI: a comparison with cefaclor and augmentin.头孢呋辛酯治疗单纯性尿路感染:与头孢克洛和阿莫西林克拉维酸钾的比较。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1987;13(2):95-9.
8
Review of the spectrum and potency of orally administered cephalosporins and amoxicillin/clavulanate.口服头孢菌素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸的抗菌谱及抗菌效力综述。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;57(3 Suppl):5S-12S. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.12.014. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
9
Cefuroxime and cefuroxime axetil versus amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.头孢呋辛和头孢呋辛酯与阿莫西林加克拉维酸治疗下呼吸道感染的对比研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Feb;11(2):118-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01967062.
10
Cefuroxime axetil: an updated review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.头孢呋辛酯:关于其在细菌感染治疗中应用的最新综述
Drugs. 2001;61(10):1455-500. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161100-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Distal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis.远侧指间关节融合术的抗生素预防
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Mar 6;11(3):e4848. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004848. eCollection 2023 Mar.