Suppr超能文献

口服头孢呋辛酯与口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较。

Comparison of oral cefuroxime axetil and oral amoxycillin/clavulanate in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Higuera F, Hidalgo H, Feris J, Giguere G, Collins J J

机构信息

Hospital General de Mexico, Mexico City.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Mar;37(3):555-64. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.3.555.

Abstract

Cefuroxime axetil has been evaluated previously in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections, but not specifically in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. In a multicentre, investigator-blinded clinical trial, 162 patients with community-acquired pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive orally either cefuroxime axetil 500 mg bid (n = 84) or amoxycillin/clavulanate 500 mg/125 mg tid (n = 78) for 10 days. Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment sputum specimens of 97 of 162 (60%) patients, the commonest isolates being Streptococcus pneumoniae (38%) and Haemophilus influenzae (18%). A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) was achieved in 100% (55 of 55) and 96% (49 of 51) of the clinically evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxycillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.23). With respect to eradication of bacterial pathogens, a satisfactory outcome (cure, presumed cure or cure with colonization) was obtained in 94% (32 of 34) and 93% (37 of 40) of bacteriologically evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxycillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 1.00). Both treatment regimens used in this study were well tolerated. The most common drug-related adverse experiences were gastrointestinal events, reported by 8% and 4%, respectively, of the patients in the amoxycillin/clavulanate and cefuroxime axetil groups, a difference which was not statistically significant (P = 0.32). These results indicate that cefuroxime axetil twice a day is as effective as amoxycillin/clavulanate three times a day in the treatment of outpatients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia.

摘要

头孢呋辛酯先前已在治疗下呼吸道感染中进行过评估,但未专门用于社区获得性肺炎的治疗。在一项多中心、研究者设盲的临床试验中,162例社区获得性肺炎患者被随机分配,分别口服500mg bid的头孢呋辛酯(n = 84)或500mg/125mg tid的阿莫西林/克拉维酸(n = 78),疗程为10天。从162例患者中的97例(60%)治疗前痰液标本中分离出病原体,最常见的分离菌为肺炎链球菌(38%)和流感嗜血杆菌(18%)。接受头孢呋辛酯或阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的可临床评估患者中,分别有100%(55/55)和96%(49/51)取得了满意的临床结局(治愈或改善)(P = 0.23)。关于细菌病原体的根除,接受头孢呋辛酯或阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的可细菌学评估患者中,分别有94%(32/34)和93%(37/40)取得了满意的结局(治愈、推定治愈或带菌治愈)(P = 1.00)。本研究中使用的两种治疗方案耐受性均良好。最常见的药物相关不良事件为胃肠道事件,阿莫西林/克拉维酸组和头孢呋辛酯组分别有8%和4%的患者报告,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.32)。这些结果表明,对于轻度至中度社区获得性肺炎门诊患者,每日两次服用头孢呋辛酯与每日三次服用阿莫西林/克拉维酸的疗效相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验