Yu B M
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1992 Dec;30(12):707-9, 777.
The results of combined CA-19-9 CEA assay were measured in 216 cases of colorectal cancer. In 28 preoperative patients, the positive rate 16.67% in Dukes' A group, 25% in B, 55% in C and 40% in D. It was proved less valuable in early diagnosis. The positive CA-19-9 alone in 66 with relapsed or metastases out of 182 undergoing radical resection was 63.63%, CEA alone 62.12%, and combined assay 86.36%. The false positive rate of CA-19-9 and CEA was 6.03% and combined assay 11.21%. In 27 palliative resections CA-19-9 in 40.74% cases, CEA in 44.44%, and combined assay in 59.2% was positive. In cases of nonresectable tumors, the positive rate was 66.7%, 66.7% and 83.33%, respectively. There was no definite correlation between the value of CA-19-9 and CEA. The data showed significantly higher sensitivity in combined assay than in either CA-19-9 or CEA alone. Combined assay with the sensitivity of 86.36% and the specificity of 88.79%, was more useful in finding of postoperative. recurrences or metastases. We suggest that this method should be used routinely in monitoring postoperative patients with colorectal cancer.
对216例结直肠癌患者进行了CA - 19 - 9和癌胚抗原(CEA)联合检测。在28例术前患者中,Dukes' A组阳性率为16.67%,B组为25%,C组为55%,D组为40%。结果表明其在早期诊断中的价值较小。在182例行根治性切除的患者中,66例复发或转移患者中单独CA - 19 - 9阳性率为63.63%,单独CEA为62.12%,联合检测为86.36%。CA - 19 - 9和CEA的假阳性率分别为6.03%和联合检测为11.21%。在27例姑息性切除患者中,CA - 19 - 9阳性率为40.74%,CEA为44.44%,联合检测为59.2%。在不可切除肿瘤患者中,阳性率分别为66.7%、66.7%和83.33%。CA - 19 - 9和CEA的值之间没有明确的相关性。数据显示联合检测的敏感性明显高于单独的CA - 19 - 9或CEA。联合检测的敏感性为86.36%,特异性为88.79%,在发现术后复发或转移方面更有用。我们建议该方法应常规用于监测结直肠癌术后患者。