Meade T W
MRC Epidemiology and Medical Care Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Ann Epidemiol. 1992 Jul;2(4):353-64. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(92)90084-4.
It was only quite recently that the thrombotic component in myocardial infarction and sudden coronary death was generally acknowledged. When attention was eventually paid to it, interest initially centered primarily on platelet function. There is, of course, no doubt about the central role of platelet adhesion and aggregation in thrombogenesis, but still no generally accepted measure of platelet function has been shown to be associated with the later onset of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Epidemiologically, the assessment of coagulability has been more rewarding. Several prospective studies have now shown a strong relationship between the plasma fibrinogen level and the incidence of IHD and stroke. Epidemiologic and laboratory studies have also implicated factor VII and extrinsic pathway activity in the onset of IHD. Other components of the hemostatic system that are probably involved include factor VIII activity and the fibrinolytic system. It is increasingly clear that lipoproteins exert a major influence on coagulability as well as their better known role in atherogenesis. Any further polarization of hypotheses for IHD as being purely atherogenic or purely thrombogenic is therefore counterproductive. At the same time, antithrombotic measures for primary prevention need to be evaluated as thoroughly as lipid-lowering regimens. If thrombosis is seen as the final arterial event in virtually all major episodes of IHD, the indications for antithrombotic agents in primary prevention may be wider than those for lipid-lowering regimens. It is therefore necessary to establish as quickly as possible not only the preventive effectiveness of antithrombotic measures, including low-dose aspirin and low-intensity oral anticoagulation, but also the relative effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic and lipid-modifying regimens.
直到最近,心肌梗死和冠状动脉猝死中的血栓形成成分才得到普遍认可。当人们最终关注到这一点时,最初的兴趣主要集中在血小板功能上。当然,血小板黏附和聚集在血栓形成中的核心作用是毋庸置疑的,但目前仍没有一种被普遍接受的血小板功能检测方法被证明与缺血性心脏病(IHD)的后期发病有关。从流行病学角度来看,对凝血性的评估更有成效。现在有几项前瞻性研究表明,血浆纤维蛋白原水平与IHD和中风的发病率之间存在密切关系。流行病学和实验室研究也表明,因子VII和外源性途径活性与IHD的发病有关。可能涉及的止血系统的其他成分包括因子VIII活性和纤溶系统。越来越明显的是,脂蛋白不仅在动脉粥样硬化形成中发挥着众所周知的作用,而且对凝血性也有重大影响。因此,将IHD的假设进一步两极分化为纯粹的动脉粥样硬化或纯粹的血栓形成是适得其反的。与此同时,一级预防的抗血栓措施需要像降脂方案一样进行全面评估。如果血栓形成被视为几乎所有IHD主要发作中的最终动脉事件,那么一级预防中抗血栓药物的适应症可能比降脂方案更广泛。因此,有必要尽快确定抗血栓措施(包括低剂量阿司匹林和低强度口服抗凝)的预防效果,以及抗血栓和脂质调节方案的相对有效性和安全性。