Lovejoy F H, Ledley F D, Nathan D G
Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1993;104:180-95; discussion 195-7.
In summary, our data suggest that the playing field for academic medicine is changing. It is more patient care oriented, more multifaceted and supported more by clinical dollars than in the past. Greater flexibility in what constitutes "academic success" is necessary to assure a supportive environment in which tomorrow's academic faculty can develop and flourish. To accomplish these goals promotion systems that reward not only research but also teaching and clinical care accomplishments will be necessary. Clinicians will need to be compared with clinicians, teachers with teachers, clinical investigators with clinical investigators and basic investigators with basic investigators. Sources of support will need to be more clearly targeted along activity lines with clinical dollars supporting the clinician, medical education dollars supporting the teacher-educators and federal and foundation dollars supporting research. In our department, time and effort for research (45%) approximates dollar support for this activity (44%), while clinical dollars (43%) fund to a greater degree time and effort committed to clinical care (34%), and administration and teaching dollars (13%) under fund time and effort committed to these activities (21%). This suggests the need to identify increased funding to support teaching and education. Promotion expectations for women will need to be more flexible and adjusted to family responsibilities and demands. Most of all, however, we academic faculty must support enthusiastically the importance and joy of our work. We must be encouraging to our colleagues and our students and continue to recognize that for all of the difficulties and challenges, academic life is a rewarding and fulfilling enterprise.
总之,我们的数据表明学术医学的竞争环境正在发生变化。它比过去更以患者护理为导向,更具多面性,且临床资金的支持力度更大。为确保营造一个支持性的环境,使未来的学术教员能够成长和蓬勃发展,有必要在“学术成就”的构成方面给予更大的灵活性。为实现这些目标,不仅要奖励研究成果,还要奖励教学和临床护理成就的晋升制度将是必要的。临床医生应与临床医生比较,教师与教师比较,临床研究人员与临床研究人员比较,基础研究人员与基础研究人员比较。支持来源需要更明确地按照活动类别进行定向,临床资金用于支持临床医生,医学教育资金用于支持教师教育工作者,联邦和基金会资金用于支持研究。在我们部门,用于研究的时间和精力(45%)与该活动的资金支持(44%)大致相当,而临床资金(43%)在更大程度上资助了投入临床护理的时间和精力(34%),行政和教学资金(13%)对投入这些活动的时间和精力(21%)的资助不足。这表明需要确定增加资金以支持教学和教育。对女性的晋升期望需要更加灵活,并根据家庭责任和需求进行调整。然而,最重要的是,我们学术教员必须热情支持我们工作的重要性和乐趣。我们必须鼓励我们的同事和学生,并继续认识到,尽管存在所有困难和挑战,但学术生活是一项有意义且令人满足的事业。