Veil C
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1992 Apr-May;150(4-5):367-70.
The untiring questioning on the part of the two sources, somatic and psychological, in illness make a pair with contradistinction between "clinical" research and "scientific" research. However, they are good theoretic and pragmatic arguments in favour of their complementarity and full respective lawfullness. In this purpose, one had to scrutinize the explicit and implicit definitions, too often adulterated by presuppositions and exclusive preferences.
疾病中身体和心理这两个源头持续不断的质疑，与“临床”研究和“科学”研究之间的区别相对应。然而，它们在理论和实践上有力地论证了二者的互补性以及各自充分的合理性。为此，人们必须审视那些常常因预设和排他性偏好而被歪曲的明确和隐含定义。
