LeBrun D P, Kamel O W, Dorfman R F, Warnke R A
Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, California.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1992 Jan;97(1):135-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/97.1.135.
The utility of staining for Leu M1 (CD15) as a diagnostic aid in Hodgkin's disease has been questioned because of a relative lack of specificity and sensitivity. Furthermore, interpretation is often made difficult by staining that tends to be weak and focal. Because the murine monoclonal anti-Leu M1 antibody is of immunoglobulin M type, it is reasonable to wonder whether improved immunohistochemical staining might result from use of a secondary goat antibody specific for the mouse mu heavy chain instead of the traditional one against mouse immunoglobulin. The two methods were compared, using a biotin-avidin detection system, on paraffin sections from 15 cases of Hodgkin's disease: 9 nodular sclerosing, 1 mixed cellularity, and 5 of nodular lymphocytic and histiocytic (L&H) type. In the nodular sclerosing/mixed cellularity group, the mu-specific detection method resulted in a greater number of cases with reactive Hodgkin's cells (7 versus 5), stained an average of more than three times as many neoplastic cells in each case (49% versus 14%), and usually produced staining that was distinctly more intense, often in a membrane and paranuclear distribution characteristic of Leu M1 in Hodgkin's cells. In the noLeu M1 in Hodgkin's cells. In the nodular L&H group, 1 case showed weak, focal staining with the newer method. None of the L&H cases stained using the traditional technique. It is concluded that use of a second-stage antibody that is directed specifically against mu heavy chains results in an improvement in immunohistochemical staining for Leu M1 in paraffin sections, which is of practical significance.
由于相对缺乏特异性和敏感性,针对Leu M1(CD15)进行染色作为霍奇金病诊断辅助手段的效用受到质疑。此外,染色往往较弱且呈局灶性,这常常使结果判读变得困难。因为鼠单克隆抗Leu M1抗体是免疫球蛋白M型,所以有理由怀疑,使用针对小鼠μ重链的特异性二抗山羊抗体而非传统的针对小鼠免疫球蛋白的二抗,是否能改善免疫组化染色效果。采用生物素 - 抗生物素蛋白检测系统,对15例霍奇金病石蜡切片的两种方法进行了比较:9例结节硬化型、1例混合细胞型以及5例结节性淋巴细胞为主型和组织细胞型(L&H型)。在结节硬化型/混合细胞型组中,μ特异性检测方法使反应性霍奇金细胞阳性的病例数更多(7例对5例),平均每例染色的肿瘤细胞数量是另一种方法的三倍多(49%对14%),并且通常产生的染色明显更强,常常呈霍奇金细胞中Leu M1特有的膜性和核旁分布。在结节性L&H组中,1例采用新方法显示出弱的局灶性染色。采用传统技术,L&H型病例均未染色。结论是,使用特异性针对μ重链的二抗可改善石蜡切片中Leu M1的免疫组化染色,具有实际意义。