• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科实践中手套清洗与重复使用的临床评估。

A clinical evaluation of glove washing and re-use in dental practice.

作者信息

Adams D, Bagg J, Limaye M, Parsons K, Absi E G

机构信息

Department of Basic Dental Science, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 1992 Mar;20(3):153-62. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90083-x.

DOI:10.1016/0195-6701(92)90083-x
PMID:1348770
Abstract

This study has assessed the durability of four brands of latex gloves, Ansell Medical 'Medi-Grip', Regent 'Biogel D', Surgikos 'Microtouch' and the London Rubber Company 'Supreme', under conditions of repeated washing and re-use in a clinical dental setting. The microbiological effectiveness of 'Hibiscrub' as a decontaminating washing agent was examined simultaneously. Examination by an electrical test for micropunctures in 200 unused gloves of each brand revealed such defects in 6(3%) of Ansell 'Medi-Grip', 3(1.5%) of 'Biogel D', 14(7%) of Surgikos 'Microtouch' and 2(1%) of LRC 'Supreme' gloves. Following repeated clinical use, micropunctures were detected in 18% of Ansell 'Medi-Grip', 10% of 'Biogel D', 75% of Surgikos 'Microtouch' and 56% of LRC 'Supreme'. Microorganisms were isolated from the glove surfaces after 45% of the occasions on which the gloves were washed for 1 min in 'Hibiscrub' (ICI Dental). Eighty-five per cent of these isolates were environmental organisms, but oral streptococci were isolated from 8.4% of the pairs of gloves examined. The high rate of micropuncture development following repeated washing and re-use of latex gloves indicates that they cannot effectively perform their barrier function under such conditions. The microbiological data have also revealed the potential for cross-infection between patients through inadequate decontamination of glove surfaces. For operative dental surgery, the results suggest that heavier, surgical type gloves are to be preferred, and that multiple use of any glove type should be discouraged.

摘要

本研究评估了安塞尔医疗公司的“Medi - Grip”、丽晶公司的“Biogel D”、外科手术用品公司的“Microtouch”以及伦敦橡胶公司的“Supreme”这四个品牌的乳胶手套在临床牙科环境中反复清洗和重复使用条件下的耐用性。同时还检测了“洗必泰醇”作为去污清洗剂的微生物学效果。通过对每个品牌200只未使用手套进行微穿刺的电气测试检查发现,安塞尔“Medi - Grip”手套中有6只(3%)存在此类缺陷,“Biogel D”手套中有3只(1.5%),外科手术用品公司的“Microtouch”手套中有14只(7%),伦敦橡胶公司的“Supreme”手套中有2只(1%)。在反复临床使用后,安塞尔“Medi - Grip”手套中有18%检测到微穿刺,“Biogel D”手套中有10%,外科手术用品公司的“Microtouch”手套中有75%,伦敦橡胶公司的“Supreme”手套中有56%。在用“洗必泰醇”(帝国化学工业公司牙科产品)对手套进行1分钟清洗的45%的情况下,从手套表面分离出了微生物。这些分离出的微生物中,85%是环境微生物,但在8.4%的被检查手套对中分离出了口腔链球菌。乳胶手套在反复清洗和重复使用后微穿刺发生率很高,这表明它们在这种条件下无法有效发挥屏障功能。微生物学数据还揭示了手套表面去污不充分可能导致患者之间交叉感染的可能性。对于口腔外科手术,结果表明应首选更厚的手术用手套,并且不鼓励对任何类型的手套进行多次使用。

相似文献

1
A clinical evaluation of glove washing and re-use in dental practice.牙科实践中手套清洗与重复使用的临床评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1992 Mar;20(3):153-62. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90083-x.
2
A laboratory assessment of the antimicrobial effectiveness of glove washing and re-use in dental practice.牙科实践中手套清洗及重复使用抗菌效果的实验室评估
J Hosp Infect. 1990 Jan;15(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90023-h.
3
The use of various handwashing agents to decontaminate gloved hands.使用各种洗手剂对手套覆盖的手进行去污。
Br Dent J. 1989 Jul 22;167(2):62-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806914.
4
A clinical and laboratory evaluation of three types of operating gloves for use in orthodontic practice.用于正畸临床操作的三种手术手套的临床与实验室评估
Br J Orthod. 1996 May;23(2):115-20. doi: 10.1179/bjo.23.2.115.
5
Physical and microbiological quality of five different examination and surgical gloves before and after use in dental practice.牙科实践中使用前后的五种不同检查和手术手套的物理和微生物质量。
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1993 Nov;195(1):27-36.
6
Anatomy of a defective barrier: sequential glove leak detection in a surgical and dental environment.有缺陷屏障的剖析:手术和牙科环境中的连续手套泄漏检测
Crit Care Med. 1992 Feb;20(2):170-84.
7
The permeability of dental gloves following exposure to certain dental materials.牙科手套暴露于某些牙科材料后的渗透性。
J Dent. 1997 Jan;25(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00124-7.
8
The effect of disinfectants on perforated gloves.消毒剂对穿孔手套的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 1991 Jul;18(3):191-200. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90143-v.
9
Influence of dental glove type on the penetration of liquid through experimental perforation: a spectrophotometric analysis.牙科手套类型对液体透过实验性穿孔渗透的影响:分光光度法分析
Quintessence Int. 1994 Sep;25(9):647-9.
10
An assessment of the incidence of punctures in latex and non-latex dental examination gloves in routine clinical practice.对乳胶和非乳胶牙科检查手套在常规临床实践中穿刺发生率的评估。
Br Dent J. 2001 Apr 14;190(7):377-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800978.