Chua K L, Taylor G S, Bagg J
Department of Child Dental Care, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, U.K.
Br J Orthod. 1996 May;23(2):115-20. doi: 10.1179/bjo.23.2.115.
This prospective study examined the durability and user acceptability of three types of operating glove for use in orthodontic practice. The glove types studied were a lightweight examination glove (Microtouch, Johnson and Johnson), a dedicated dental procedure glove (Biogel D, Regent Hospital Products) and a non-latex, nitrile glove (N-Dex, Best Manufacturing Europe N.V.). A water-leak test was used to examine 50 pairs of unused gloves of each type for manufacturing defects. Subsequently, six operators of varying experience were asked to use 20 pairs of each type of glove for fixed appliance treatment sessions and record their suitability for different clinical procedures. The used gloves were collected and tested in the laboratory for punctures. At the end of the study the six operators completed a detailed questionnaire recording their preferences for each glove type.
这项前瞻性研究考察了三种用于正畸临床操作的手术手套的耐用性和用户接受度。所研究的手套类型包括一种轻型检查手套（Microtouch，强生公司）、一种专用牙科手术手套（Biogel D，Regent医院产品公司）和一种非乳胶丁腈手套（N-Dex，Best Manufacturing Europe N.V.）。采用漏水测试对每种类型的50副未使用过的手套进行制造缺陷检查。随后，邀请六名经验各异的操作人员在固定矫治器治疗过程中使用每种类型的20副手套，并记录其对不同临床操作的适用性。收集用过的手套并在实验室检测是否有穿刺破损。在研究结束时，六名操作人员填写了一份详细问卷，记录他们对每种手套类型的偏好。
