Andreasen J O, Andreasen F M
Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery, University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1992;88 Suppl 1:95-114.
Permanent teeth are usually not attacked by osteoclasts despite their situation in a site where active bone resorption constantly takes place as a result of local and systemic osteoclast activating factors. This fact points to antiresorption factors residing in both the periodontal ligament (PDL) and the pulp. Concerning the PDL homeostasis factor (i.e. permanency of a separation between the alveolar socket and the root surface and protection of the root surface against osteoclastic activity), recent studies have shown that this factor, at least with respect to trauma and wound healing, is linked to, and probably resides in, the cementoblast layer and/or the cells next to this layer. If there is loss of this tissue integrity, root resorption may occur; especially if non-PDL derived cells gain access to the site. With respect to the pulp, no systematic research has been performed regarding the homeostasis of this structure (i.e. permanency of the pulpal organ with its specific anatomy and functional stability). In evaluating the events where resorption does occur, it appears that the loss of tissue components within the pulp (including odontoblasts) implies a risk of root canal resorption if nonpulpally derived cells gain access to the site. Root resorption following traumatic dental injuries, whether located along the root surface or within the root canal appears to be a sequel to wound healing events, where a significant amount of the PDL or pulp has been lost due to the effect of acute trauma. The goal of these processes is removal of injured tissue from zones of trauma, space creation for neovascularization or control of infection. Irrespective of the goal, these processes have a potential for root resorption. The type of tissue repair, i.e. repair originating from the dental pulp, the PDL or bone or a combination, seems to be of importance in determining the risk of root resorption during the healing process.
尽管恒牙所处的部位由于局部和全身破骨细胞激活因子的作用,经常发生活跃的骨吸收,但恒牙通常不会受到破骨细胞的攻击。这一事实表明,牙周膜(PDL)和牙髓中存在抗吸收因子。关于PDL稳态因子(即牙槽窝与牙根表面之间保持分离状态以及保护牙根表面免受破骨细胞活性影响的永久性),最近的研究表明,至少就创伤和伤口愈合而言,该因子与成牙骨质细胞层和/或该层旁边的细胞相关联,并且可能存在于这些细胞中。如果这种组织完整性丧失,可能会发生牙根吸收;特别是如果非PDL来源的细胞进入该部位。关于牙髓,尚未对该结构的稳态(即牙髓器官及其特定解剖结构和功能稳定性的永久性)进行系统研究。在评估确实发生吸收的情况时,如果非牙髓来源的细胞进入该部位,牙髓内组织成分(包括成牙本质细胞)的丧失似乎意味着根管吸收的风险。牙齿外伤后发生的牙根吸收,无论位于牙根表面还是根管内,似乎都是伤口愈合事件的后续结果,在急性创伤的作用下,大量的PDL或牙髓已经丧失。这些过程的目标是从创伤区域清除受损组织、为新血管形成创造空间或控制感染。无论目标如何,这些过程都有导致牙根吸收的可能性。组织修复的类型,即源自牙髓、PDL或骨或它们的组合的修复,在确定愈合过程中牙根吸收的风险方面似乎很重要。