• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Therapeutic activity, clinical and gastric tolerance of 20mg daily dose of droxicam in comparison with piroxicam in patients with degenerative joint disease.

作者信息

Schüetz E, Sánchez J, García-Barbal J, Sarti J F, Reuter C, Harrison F J

机构信息

Clinic Dr E. Schüetz, Regensburg, FRG.

出版信息

Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):21-8.

PMID:1365486
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of droxicam were compared with piroxicam in a pilot study in twenty patients with degenerative joint disease. After a one week washout period a baseline gastroscopy was carried out. Treatment during the following 4 weeks was randomised to droxicam or piroxicam. Safety and tolerance parameters were monitored at weekly intervals. Pain was evaluated with two visual analogue scales (VAS) (patient and investigator). Affected joints, articular index (AI), patient's status and a daily living activities questionnaire were also evaluated. Another gastroscopy was carried out at the end of the treatment period. Droxicam and piroxicam relieved all symptoms significantly without statistically significant clinical differences. Both groups showed no drug related side effects in the laboratory values. In the gastroscopic examinations two patients of the droxicam group and four of piroxicam group had minor gastric erosions after four weeks of treatment without any accompanying clinical symptoms.

摘要

相似文献

1
Therapeutic activity, clinical and gastric tolerance of 20mg daily dose of droxicam in comparison with piroxicam in patients with degenerative joint disease.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):21-8.
2
A clinical trial comparing a new NSAID (droxicam) and piroxicam in spinal osteoarthritis.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1990 Oct;28(10):416-9.
3
Double-blind, randomized and parallel comparison between droxicam and diclofenac sodium in patients with coxarthrosis and gonarthrosis.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):29-34.
4
Safety and efficacy of etodolac compared with piroxicam in patients with degenerative joint disease of the knee.依托度酸与吡罗昔康治疗膝关节退行性关节病患者的安全性及有效性比较
Clin Ther. 1992 Jul-Aug;14(4):517-26.
5
Comparative study of the multiple dose pharmacokinetics and the tolerance of a new NSAID (droxicam) versus piroxicam in healthy volunteers.新型非甾体抗炎药(屈昔康)与吡罗昔康在健康志愿者中多次给药的药代动力学及耐受性的对比研究。
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Nov;10(11):729-37.
6
Adverse events with droxicam in the early clinical trials.早期临床试验中屈昔康的不良事件。
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):50-8.
7
A double-blind randomised controlled trial of droxicam versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):15-20.
8
Droxicam: a pharmacological and clinical review of a new NSAID.屈昔康:一种新型非甾体抗炎药的药理学与临床综述
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):3-9.
9
Pharmacokinetic profile of droxicam.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):10-4.
10
Comparative double-blind study of droxicam (new NSAID) versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.在类风湿性关节炎中,对新非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)屈昔康与吲哚美辛进行的双盲对照研究。
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):35-44.