• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A double-blind randomised controlled trial of droxicam versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Sánchez Andrada S, Rodríguez Valverde V

机构信息

Section of Rheumatology, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):15-20.

PMID:1365485
Abstract

This double-blind randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy of droxicam (20mg/day) and that of indomethacin (100mg/day) administered to 20 patients (7 men, 13 women; aged 54.7 +/- 13.2 years) with active classical or definite rheumatoid arthritis during 9 weeks, after a 7-day single-blind run-in paracetamol (1,500mg/day) period. Evaluations were carried out at weeks 0 (washout), 1,2,4,6 and 9. After 9 weeks of treatment, both drugs showed a statistically significant improvement of joint pain intensity, articular index (number of swollen or painful joints and degree of involvement), duration of morning stiffness, functional capacity, and level of fatigue. Inter-treatment differences at all study intervals were not observed. Grip strength improved only in indomethacin-treated patients. Withdrawals due to lack of therapeutic efficacy did not occur. Side effects occurred in four patients from each group. One patient in the indomethacin group withdrew at the week 1 due to epigastric pain and heartburn. In conclusion, droxicam (20mg/day) seems to be as effective as indomethacin (100mg/day) in the alleviation of symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

摘要

相似文献

1
A double-blind randomised controlled trial of droxicam versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):15-20.
2
Comparative double-blind study of droxicam (new NSAID) versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.在类风湿性关节炎中,对新非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)屈昔康与吲哚美辛进行的双盲对照研究。
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):35-44.
3
Double-blind, randomized and parallel comparison between droxicam and diclofenac sodium in patients with coxarthrosis and gonarthrosis.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):29-34.
4
Results of a double-blind study with indomethacin and indoprofen, a new non-steroidal antirheumatic agent.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):79-86.
5
Ketoprofen versus indomethacin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter double blind comparative study.
J Rheumatol. 1988 Oct;15(10):1476-9.
6
Double-blind crossover comparison of piroxicam and indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.吡罗昔康与吲哚美辛治疗类风湿性关节炎的双盲交叉对照研究
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1983;6(3):291-6.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of valdecoxib in treating the signs and symptoms of severe rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.伐地考昔治疗重度类风湿关节炎体征和症状的疗效及耐受性:一项为期12周的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1071-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.016.
8
Indoprofen versus indomethacin and placebo. A double-blind three-way cross-over trial in rheumatoid arthritis.吲哚洛芬与吲哚美辛及安慰剂对照:类风湿关节炎的双盲三向交叉试验
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):74-8.
9
Etodolac versus diclofenac: double-blind cross-over study in rheumatoid arthritis.依托度酸与双氯芬酸对比:类风湿性关节炎的双盲交叉研究
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1989;9(3):217-22.
10
Therapeutic activity, clinical and gastric tolerance of 20mg daily dose of droxicam in comparison with piroxicam in patients with degenerative joint disease.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):21-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain management for inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and other spondylarthritis) and gastrointestinal or liver comorbidity.炎症性关节炎(类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎、强直性脊柱炎及其他脊柱关节炎)与胃肠道或肝脏合并症的疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008951.pub2.