• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不良习惯与不良基因:20世纪初美国消除梅毒及相关“缺陷”的优生学尝试。

Bad habits and bad genes: early 20th-century eugenic attempts to eliminate syphilis and associated "defects" from the United States.

作者信息

Wilson Philip K

机构信息

Penn State College of Medicine.

出版信息

Can Bull Med Hist. 2003;20(1):11-41. doi: 10.3138/cbmh.20.1.11.

DOI:10.3138/cbmh.20.1.11
PMID:13678041
Abstract

American eugenists in the early 20th century distinguished "degenerates," including syphilitics, prostitutes, alcoholics and criminals, from the "normal" population by their particular bad habits. From eugenists' viewpoint, these bad habits were derived from bad character, a flaw that stemmed from an individual's bad genes. This essay explores how eugenists during this period characterized syphilitics and those with associated character "defects" in terms of heredity. Additionally, it examines the methods eugenists most frequently advocated to rectify these bad habits. These methods included marriage restriction, immigration control and reproductive sterilization. Overall, eugenists directed their efforts not so much at the "degenerate" as at his or her germ line.

摘要

20世纪初,美国优生学家根据“退化者”(包括梅毒患者、妓女、酗酒者和罪犯)的特殊不良习惯,将他们与“正常”人群区分开来。在优生学家看来,这些不良习惯源自不良性格,而这种缺陷源于个体的不良基因。本文探讨了这一时期优生学家如何从遗传角度描述梅毒患者以及具有相关性格“缺陷”的人。此外,还考察了优生学家最常倡导的纠正这些不良习惯的方法。这些方法包括婚姻限制、移民控制和生殖绝育。总体而言,优生学家的努力并非主要针对“退化者”本人,而是针对其生殖细胞系。

相似文献

1
Bad habits and bad genes: early 20th-century eugenic attempts to eliminate syphilis and associated "defects" from the United States.不良习惯与不良基因:20世纪初美国消除梅毒及相关“缺陷”的优生学尝试。
Can Bull Med Hist. 2003;20(1):11-41. doi: 10.3138/cbmh.20.1.11.
2
Eugenics and Involuntary Sterilization: 1907-2015.优生学与非自愿绝育:1907 - 2015年
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:351-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-024930.
3
Eugenics, medicine and psychiatry in Peru.秘鲁的优生学、医学与精神病学。
Hist Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;29(1):96-109. doi: 10.1177/0957154X17741232. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
4
Eugenics, medical education, and the Public Health Service: Another perspective on the Tuskegee syphilis experiment.优生学、医学教育与公共卫生服务:对塔斯基吉梅毒实验的另一种视角
Bull Hist Med. 2006 Summer;80(2):291-316. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2006.0066.
5
Anthropometry, Race, and Eugenic Research: “Measurements of Growing Negro Children” at the Tuskegee Institute, 1932–1944.人体测量学、种族与优生学研究:1932年至1944年塔斯基吉学院的“成长中的黑人儿童测量”
Clio Med. 2016;95:215-39.
6
The role of Eugenics in research misconduct.优生学在科研不端行为中的作用。
Mo Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;111(5):386-90.
7
Duty or dream? Edwin G. Conklin's critique of eugenics and support for American individualism.责任还是梦想?埃德温·G·康克林对优生学的批判与对美国个人主义的支持。
J Hist Biol. 2002 Summer;35(2):365-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1016077829496.
8
Assisted procreation and its relationship to genetics and eugenics.辅助生殖及其与遗传学和优生学的关系。
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2009;15(1):7-27.
9
Involuntary sterilization in the United States: a surgical solution.美国的非自愿绝育:一种外科手术解决方案。
Q Rev Biol. 1987 Jun;62(2):153-70. doi: 10.1086/415404.
10
History of the eugenic movement.优生运动的历史。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2002;39(4):217-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging communities: A scoping literature review of community-based participatory research in genetics service delivery settings.社区参与:对基因服务提供环境中基于社区的参与式研究的范围界定文献综述。
J Community Genet. 2024 Dec;15(6):583-602. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00740-9. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Republicans, Democrats, & Doctors: The Lawmakers Who Wrote Sterilization Laws.共和党人、民主党人和医生:撰写绝育法的立法者。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(1):123-130. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.47. Epub 2023 May 25.