• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography.用于颅内血管成形术的小血管支架:通过CT血管造影术对不同支架设计和尺寸进行体外比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Sep;24(8):1512-6.
2
Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners.CT血管造影术下的颈动脉支架:使用16排、64排和320排CT扫描仪对不同支架设计和尺寸进行体外比较
J Neuroradiol. 2014 Oct;41(4):259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.10.003. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
3
Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents using two different angiography systems.血管造影 CT:两种不同血管造影系统下不同颈动脉支架的体外比较。
J Neuroradiol. 2013 Dec;40(5):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.颈动脉支架:在 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振成像下使用 CT 血管造影和对比增强磁共振血管造影对不同支架设计和尺寸的体外比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Nov;30(10):1993-7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1743. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
5
Small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro evaluation of in-stent stenoses using CT angiography.用于颅内血管成形术的小血管支架:使用CT血管造影对支架内狭窄进行体外评估。
Neuroradiology. 2004 Jun;46(6):459-63. doi: 10.1007/s00234-004-1205-3. Epub 2004 May 1.
6
Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents-does stent orientation matter?血管造影 CT:不同颈动脉支架的体外比较——支架方向是否重要?
Neuroradiology. 2013 Jun;55(6):675-82. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1152-y. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
7
In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T.体外比较不同颈动脉支架:使用 CT 血管造影和 1.5T 和 3T 增强磁共振血管造影的逐像素分析。
Neuroradiology. 2010 Sep;52(9):823-30. doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0625-5. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
8
In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?冠状动脉支架的体外成像:16 层和 64 层 CT 扫描仪之间是否存在差异?
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.032. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
9
Evaluation of middle cerebral artery stents using multidetector row CT angiography in vivo study: comparison of the three different kernels.使用多排探测器CT血管造影术对大脑中动脉支架进行体内研究:三种不同内核的比较
Acta Radiol. 2012 May 1;53(4):456-60. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.110659. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
10
3.0 Tesla contrast-enhanced MR angiography of carotid artery stents: in vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla.3.0特斯拉颈动脉支架对比增强磁共振血管造影:与1.5特斯拉对比的体外测量
J Neuroradiol. 2006 Apr;33(2):75-80. doi: 10.1016/s0150-9861(06)77234-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Off-resonance magnetic resonance angiography improves visualization of in-stent lumen in peripheral nitinol stents compared to conventional T1-weighted acquisitions: an in vitro comparison study.与传统T1加权成像相比,非共振磁共振血管造影可改善外周镍钛诺支架内支架腔的可视化:一项体外比较研究。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;32(11):1645-1655. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0955-4. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
2
Flat-detector computed tomography evaluation in an experimental animal aneurysm model after endovascular treatment: A pilot study.血管内治疗后实验性动物动脉瘤模型的平板探测器计算机断层扫描评估:一项初步研究。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;21(4):490-8. doi: 10.1177/1591019915590364. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
3
Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents-does stent orientation matter?血管造影 CT:不同颈动脉支架的体外比较——支架方向是否重要?
Neuroradiology. 2013 Jun;55(6):675-82. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1152-y. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
4
Evaluation of stent visibility by flat panel detector CT in patients treated for intracranial aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤治疗患者的平板探测器 CT 评估支架可视性。
Neuroradiology. 2012 Oct;54(10):1121-5. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-1002-8. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
5
Flat-detector computed tomography in the assessment of intracranial stents: comparison with multi detector CT and conventional angiography in a new animal model.平面探测器计算机断层扫描在颅内支架评估中的应用:新动物模型中与多探测器 CT 和常规血管造影的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2011 Aug;21(8):1779-87. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2093-7. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
6
In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T.体外比较不同颈动脉支架:使用 CT 血管造影和 1.5T 和 3T 增强磁共振血管造影的逐像素分析。
Neuroradiology. 2010 Sep;52(9):823-30. doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0625-5. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
7
Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.颈动脉支架:在 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振成像下使用 CT 血管造影和对比增强磁共振血管造影对不同支架设计和尺寸的体外比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Nov;30(10):1993-7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1743. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
8
Assessment of the Intracranial Stents Patency and Re-Stenosis by 16-Slice CT Angiography with Optimized Sharp Kernel : Preliminary Study.16层CT血管造影结合优化锐化内核评估颅内支架通畅性及再狭窄:初步研究
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009 May;45(5):284-8. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.45.5.284. Epub 2009 May 31.
9
Evaluation of various image reconstruction parameters in lower extremity stents using multidetector-row CT angiography: initial findings.使用多排探测器CT血管造影术评估下肢支架的各种图像重建参数:初步结果。
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0315-1. Epub 2006 May 30.
10
Angiographic CT in cerebrovascular stenting.脑血管支架置入术中的血管造影CT
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Aug;26(7):1813-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Appearance of vascular stents in computed tomographic angiography: in vitro examination of 14 different stent types.计算机断层血管造影中血管支架的表现:14种不同支架类型的体外检查
Invest Radiol. 2001 Nov;36(11):652-8. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200111000-00005.
2
[Metallic biomaterials for coronary stents].[用于冠状动脉支架的金属生物材料]
Z Kardiol. 2001 Apr;90(4):251-62. doi: 10.1007/s003920170171.
3
Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study.诊断性脑血管造影和神经介入手术中的无症状栓塞:一项前瞻性研究。
Lancet. 1999 Nov 6;354(9190):1594-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)07083-X.
4
The clinical value of methods to measure carotid stenosis.测量颈动脉狭窄方法的临床价值。
Int Angiol. 1996 Dec;15(4):295-9.
5
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: assessment with helical CT angiography.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术:螺旋CT血管造影评估
Radiology. 1997 Jan;202(1):277-80. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988224.
6
Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA. Complication rate and control of risk factors.选择性脑动脉内数字减影血管造影。并发症发生率及危险因素控制。
Neuroradiology. 1990;32(4):296-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00593048.
7
Arteriographic complications in the DSA era.数字减影血管造影(DSA)时代的动脉造影并发症。
Radiology. 1992 Jan;182(1):243-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.1.1727290.

用于颅内血管成形术的小血管支架:通过CT血管造影术对不同支架设计和尺寸进行体外比较

Small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography.

作者信息

Hähnel Stefan, Trossbach Manuel, Braun Cora, Heiland Sabine, Knauth Michael, Sartor Klaus, Hartmann Marius

机构信息

Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Germany.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Sep;24(8):1512-6.

PMID:13679261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7973988/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Our purpose was to evaluate whether CT angiography is a suitable alternative to conventional angiography in the evaluation of small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty.

METHODS

CT angiographic appearances of 23 stents of different designs and sizes (2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mm) were investigated after they were filled with a solution of 0.9% NaCl or diluted contrast medium. For each stent, artificial lumen narrowing (ALN) was measured, and the difference in the number of pixels with a Hounsfield value below 200 HU between the two filling states, DIFF(HU<200), was calculated to provide an objective indicator of the size of the evaluable stent diameter.

RESULTS

With a window width of 1500 HU at a window level of 400 HU, ALN ranged from 66.8% to 97.7% in the group of 2.0-mm stents and from 38.6% to 66.8% in the groups of 3.0- and 4.0-mm stents. For the 2.0-mm stents, DIFF(HU<200) was zero. In the groups of 3.0- and 4.0-mm stents, DIFF(HU<200) ranged from 0.3 to 6.7, corresponding to a diameter of 0.13-3.0 mm, when the pixel size was presupposed to be 0.449 mm.

CONCLUSION

CT angiographic evaluation of small-vessel patency after stent placement is considerably impaired by ALN. Stent manufacturers should be aware of potential artifacts caused by their stents during noninvasive diagnostic studies such as CT angiography.

摘要

背景与目的

我们的目的是评估在颅内血管成形术中小血管支架的评估中,CT血管造影是否是传统血管造影的合适替代方法。

方法

在23个不同设计和尺寸(2.0、3.0和4.0毫米)的支架填充0.9%氯化钠溶液或稀释造影剂后,研究其CT血管造影表现。对于每个支架,测量人工管腔狭窄(ALN),并计算两种填充状态下Hounsfield值低于200 HU的像素数量差异DIFF(HU<200),以提供可评估支架直径大小的客观指标。

结果

在窗宽1500 HU、窗位400 HU时,2.0毫米支架组的ALN范围为66.8%至97.7%,3.0毫米和4.0毫米支架组的ALN范围为38.6%至66.8%。对于2.0毫米支架,DIFF(HU<200)为零。在3.0毫米和4.0毫米支架组中,当预设像素大小为0.449毫米时,DIFF(HU<200)范围为0.3至6.7,对应直径为0.13至3.0毫米。

结论

支架置入后小血管通畅性的CT血管造影评估因ALN而受到显著损害。支架制造商应意识到其支架在CT血管造影等非侵入性诊断研究过程中可能产生的伪影。