• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在对重症患者停止和撤除生命支持期间镇静剂和镇痛药的开具及使用

Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients.

作者信息

Wilson W C, Smedira N G, Fink C, McDowell J A, Luce J M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

JAMA. 1992 Feb 19;267(7):949-53.

PMID:1370853
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine why and how sedatives and analgesics are ordered and administered during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

SETTING

Medical-surgical intensive care units at a county hospital and a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Consecutive 1-year sample of 22 patients from whom life support was withheld or withdrawn in one intensive care unit at a county hospital and a random sample of 22 similar patients in the intensive care unit in the university hospital over the same period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Physicians and nurses were interviewed to determine their reasons for ordering and administering drugs, and medical records were reviewed to document amounts of drugs ordered and administered.

RESULTS

Drugs were given to 75% of patients during withholding and withdrawal of life support. Patients who did not receive medication were comatose and considered incapable of benefiting from sedation and analgesia. The median time until death following the initiation of the withholding or withdrawal of life support was 3.5 hours in the patients who received drugs and 1.3 hours in those patients who did not (P, not significant). Physicians ordered drugs to decrease pain in 88% of patients, to decrease anxiety in 85%, to decrease air hunger in 76%, to comfort families in 82%, and to hasten death in 39%; in no instance was hastening death the only reason cited. The amounts of benzodiazepines and opiates averaged 2.2 mg/h of diazepam and 3.3 mg/h of morphine sulfate in the 24 hours before withholding and withdrawal of life support and 9.8 mg/h and 11.2 mg/h in the 24 hours thereafter (P less than .025 and P less than .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Large doses of sedatives and analgesics were ordered primarily to relieve pain and suffering during the withholding and withdrawal of life support, and death was not hastened by drug administration.

摘要

目的

确定在对重症患者停止和撤除生命支持期间,镇静剂和镇痛药的开具及使用原因和方式。

设计

前瞻性病例系列研究。

地点

一家县医院和一家大学医院的内科-外科重症监护病房。

患者

在县医院的一个重症监护病房连续1年选取的22例停止或撤除生命支持的患者样本,以及同期在大学医院重症监护病房随机选取的22例类似患者。

主要观察指标

对医生和护士进行访谈以确定他们开具和使用药物的原因,并查阅病历记录药物的开具和使用量。

结果

在停止和撤除生命支持期间,75%的患者接受了药物治疗。未接受药物治疗的患者处于昏迷状态,被认为无法从镇静和镇痛中获益。在接受药物治疗的患者中,停止或撤除生命支持开始至死亡的中位时间为3.5小时,未接受药物治疗的患者为1.3小时(P值,无显著性差异)。医生开具药物的原因包括:减轻88%患者的疼痛、减轻85%患者的焦虑、减轻76%患者的呼吸急促感、安抚82%患者的家属以及加速39%患者的死亡;在任何情况下,加速死亡都不是唯一被提及的原因。在停止和撤除生命支持前24小时,苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物的平均用量分别为地西泮2.2毫克/小时和硫酸吗啡3.3毫克/小时,之后24小时分别为9.8毫克/小时和11.2毫克/小时(P值分别小于0.025和0.001)。

结论

在停止和撤除生命支持期间,开具大剂量镇静剂和镇痛药主要是为了减轻疼痛和痛苦,药物使用并未加速患者死亡。

相似文献

1
Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients.在对重症患者停止和撤除生命支持期间镇静剂和镇痛药的开具及使用
JAMA. 1992 Feb 19;267(7):949-53.
2
Analgesics, sedatives and neuromuscular blockers as part of end-of-life decisions in Dutch NICUs.镇痛药、镇静剂和神经肌肉阻滞剂在荷兰新生儿重症监护病房临终决策中的应用
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009 Nov;94(6):F434-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.149260. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
3
Withholding and withdrawing life support from the critically ill: how does it work in clinical practice?对重症患者停止和撤除生命支持:在临床实践中是如何操作的?
Respir Care. 1991 May;36(5):417-26.
4
End-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit after the forgoing of life-sustaining treatment.放弃维持生命治疗后儿科重症监护病房的临终关怀。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):3060-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00064.
5
Evaluation of a standardized order form for the withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房生命支持撤除标准化医嘱单的评估
Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1141-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000125509.34805.0c.
6
Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study.重症监护病房中撤除和停止生命支持:一项西班牙前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Nov;27(11):1744-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1111-7. Epub 2001 Oct 12.
7
Withholding and withdrawing of life support from patients with severe head injury.对重度颅脑损伤患者生命支持的撤除与 withholding(此处“withholding”结合语境推测意思是“停止给予”之类,因未完整语境较难精准翻译)
Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;23(9):1567-75. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199509000-00018.
8
Most critically ill patients are perceived to die in comfort during withdrawal of life support: a Canadian multicentre study.大多数重症患者在撤除生命支持期间被认为是在舒适中离世:一项加拿大多中心研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2004 Jun-Jul;51(6):623-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03018407.
9
Managing intentions: the end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia.意图管理:临终时镇痛药和镇静剂的使用,以及缓慢安乐死的可能性。
Bioethics. 2008 Aug;22(7):388-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00661.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
10
Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.对重症患者生命支持的撤除与 withholding(此处 withholding 可意译为“不予提供”)
N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 1;322(5):309-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199002013220506.

引用本文的文献

1
Associated Factors of High Sedative Requirements within Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19 ARDS.中重度新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者镇静需求高的相关因素
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 25;11(3):588. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030588.
2
Goods, causes and intentions: problems with applying the doctrine of double effect to palliative sedation.货物、原因和意图:将双效作用理论应用于缓和性镇静的问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Oct 19;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00709-0.
3
Pain management during the withholding and withdrawal of life support in critically ill patients at the end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
终末期危重症患者生命支持终止与撤除过程中的疼痛管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep;46(9):1671-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06139-7. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
4
The influence of alcohol abuse on agitation, delirium and sedative requirements of patients admitted to a general intensive care unit.酒精滥用对入住综合重症监护病房患者的激越、谵妄及镇静需求的影响。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 Aug;20(3):208-215. doi: 10.1177/1751143718787748. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
Sedation practices and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in a prospective multicenter cohort.机械通气患者镇静实践与临床结局的前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Apr 17;23(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2394-9.
6
A Novel Research Method for Determining Sedative Exposure in Critically Ill Patients.一种用于确定重症患者镇静剂暴露量的新型研究方法。
Nurs Res. 2019 Jan/Feb;68(1):73-79. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000322.
7
Psychiatric symptoms after acute respiratory distress syndrome: a 5-year longitudinal study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征后出现的精神症状:一项 5 年纵向研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jan;44(1):38-47. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-5009-4. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
8
Physical declines occurring after hospital discharge in ARDS survivors: a 5-year longitudinal study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征幸存者出院后身体机能下降:一项为期 5 年的纵向研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1557-1566. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4530-1. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
9
Association between tidal volume size, duration of ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis.无急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的潮气量大小、通气时间与镇静需求之间的关系:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):950-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3318-4. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Improved analgesia, sedation, and delirium protocol associated with decreased duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation.改进的镇痛、镇静和谵妄方案与谵妄持续时间和机械通气时间的缩短相关。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Mar;11(3):367-74. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-210OC.