Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 1830 E Monument St., Suite 555, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Escuela Profesional de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina Alberto Hurtado, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Crit Care. 2019 Apr 17;23(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2394-9.
We sought to study the association between sedation status, medications (benzodiazepines, opioids, and antipsychotics), and clinical outcomes in a resource-limited setting.
A longitudinal study of critically ill participants on mechanical ventilation.
Five intensive care units (ICUs) in four public hospitals in Lima, Peru.
One thousand six hundred fifty-seven critically ill participants were assessed daily for sedation status during 28 days and vital status by day 90.
After excluding data of participants without a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score and without sedation, we followed 1338 (81%) participants longitudinally for 18,645 ICU days. Deep sedation was present in 98% of participants at some point of the study and in 12,942 ICU days. Deep sedation was associated with higher mortality (interquartile odds ratio (OR) = 5.42, 4.23-6.95; p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in ventilator (- 7.27; p < 0.001), ICU (- 4.38; p < 0.001), and hospital (- 7.00; p < 0.001) free days. Agitation was also associated with higher mortality (OR = 39.9, 6.53-243, p < 0.001). The most commonly used sedatives were opioids and benzodiazepines (9259 and 8453 patient days respectively), and the latter were associated with a 41% higher mortality in participants with a higher cumulative dose (75th vs 25th percentile, interquartile OR = 1.41, 1.12-1.77; p < 0.01). The overall cumulative dose of benzodiazepines and opioids was high, 774.5 mg and 16.8 g, respectively, by day 7 and by day 28; these doses approximately doubled. Haloperidol was only used in 3% of ICU days; however, the use of it was associated with a 70% lower mortality (interquartile OR = 0.3, 0.22-0.44, p < 0.001).
Deep sedation, agitation, and cumulative dose of benzodiazepines were all independently associated with higher 90-day mortality. Additionally, deep sedation was associated with less ventilator-, ICU-, and hospital-free days. In contrast, haloperidol was associated with lower mortality in our study.
我们旨在研究资源有限环境下镇静状态、药物(苯二氮䓬类、阿片类和抗精神病药)与临床结局之间的关系。
对机械通气的危重症患者进行的纵向研究。
秘鲁利马的四家公立医院的五家重症监护病房(ICU)。
在 28 天内每天评估 1657 名危重症参与者的镇静状态,并在第 90 天评估存活状态。
排除无 Richmond 躁动镇静量表评分且无镇静数据的参与者后,我们对 1338 名(81%)参与者进行了 18645 个 ICU 天的纵向随访。研究过程中有 98%的参与者存在深度镇静,深度镇静持续了 12942 个 ICU 天。深度镇静与更高的死亡率相关(四分位距比值比[OR] = 5.42,4.23-6.95;p < 0.001),并显著降低了呼吸机(-7.27;p < 0.001)、ICU(-4.38;p < 0.001)和医院(-7.00;p < 0.001)的无干预天数。躁动也与更高的死亡率相关(OR = 39.9,6.53-243,p < 0.001)。最常用的镇静剂是阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物(分别为 9259 和 8453 个患者天),累积剂量较高的患者死亡率更高(第 75 百分位比第 25 百分位,四分位距 OR = 1.41,1.12-1.77;p < 0.01)。到第 7 天和第 28 天,苯二氮䓬类和阿片类药物的累积剂量分别高达 774.5mg 和 16.8g,约为初始剂量的两倍。氟哌啶醇仅在 3%的 ICU 天使用,但它与降低 70%的死亡率相关(四分位距 OR = 0.3,0.22-0.44,p < 0.001)。
深度镇静、躁动和苯二氮䓬类药物的累积剂量均与 90 天死亡率的增加独立相关。此外,深度镇静与呼吸机、ICU 和医院无干预天数的减少有关。相比之下,氟哌啶醇在我们的研究中与较低的死亡率相关。