Celotti L, Ferraro P, Biasin M R
Department of Biology, University of Padua, Italy.
Mutat Res. 1992 Jan;281(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(92)90031-c.
The sensitivity and reliability of UDS and FADU in detecting mutagenic effects were compared by measuring DNA damage and repair in PBL treated in vitro with UV light, MMS and BPDE. The results indicate that FADU is more sensitive than UDS, as it is able to detect DNA damage at doses 3-4-fold lower. We also determined the DNA damage and repair induced by the above agents on lymphocyte samples from different donors by FADU and UDS, confirming that the DNA repair process in humans is characterized by interindividually variable efficiency.
通过测量经紫外线、甲基磺酸甲酯(MMS)和苯并[a]芘二醇环氧化物(BPDE)体外处理的外周血淋巴细胞(PBL)中的DNA损伤和修复情况,比较了UDS(未提及具体中文名称,可能是某种检测方法)和FADU(未提及具体中文名称,可能是某种检测方法)在检测诱变效应方面的敏感性和可靠性。结果表明,FADU比UDS更敏感,因为它能够在低3 - 4倍的剂量下检测到DNA损伤。我们还通过FADU和UDS测定了上述试剂对来自不同供体的淋巴细胞样本诱导的DNA损伤和修复情况,证实人类的DNA修复过程具有个体间效率可变的特征。