Simula A P, Priestly B G
Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Mutat Res. 1992 Feb;271(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(92)90031-g.
Species differences in dispositional factors such as distribution, metabolism and excretion may often account for species differences in the toxic responses to foreign chemicals. In this study we compared the genotoxic responses of cyclophosphamide (CP) and styrene (ST) between Porton rats and LACA Swiss mice in three in vivo assays (bone marrow micronucleus (MN), sperm morphology (SM) and sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) assays). The sensitivities of the three assays were compared by the doses of the compounds required to elicit a significant genotoxic response. The baseline levels for the MN, SCE and SM assays were 1.1-1.4 and 1.2-1.3 MNPCEs/1000 PCEs, 0.23-0.24 and 0.20-0.21 SCEs/chromosome, 3.5-5.7% and 1.6-1.9% abnormal sperm in mice and rats, respectively. CP was a potent genotoxin in the MN and SCE assays but weakly genotoxic in the SM assay. At comparable doses, the rat was approximately 3-, 2.5- and 1.8-fold more sensitive to CP than mice in the MN, SM and SCE assays, respectively. ST produced weak genotoxic responses in all assays in mice and only in the SM and SCE assays in rats. The mice were more sensitive to ST in the MN and SM assays, while it was difficult to compare the species in the SCE assay. For both compounds the sensitivity of the three assays, in decreasing order, were SCE greater than MN much greater than SM. For CP the relative responses in the Porton rats and LACA Swiss mice were qualitatively similar to previous reports. Although the use of different strains may explain differences between the studies in the magnitude of the responses observed. The results for ST in the rat shows that the choice of genotoxic endpoint can determine whether a response is detectable. Moreover, the discrepancies between the results for ST in this study and others, suggest that as well as using a battery of in vivo tests, it may be prudent to select more that one strain or species to fully assess a compound's ability to produce DNA damage.
分布、代谢和排泄等处置因素的种属差异,往往可以解释对外源化学物质毒性反应的种属差异。在本研究中,我们在三项体内试验(骨髓微核(MN)、精子形态(SM)和姐妹染色单体交换(SCE)试验)中比较了波顿大鼠和LACA瑞士小鼠对环磷酰胺(CP)和苯乙烯(ST)的遗传毒性反应。通过引发显著遗传毒性反应所需的化合物剂量来比较这三项试验的敏感性。MN、SCE和SM试验的基线水平分别为:小鼠和大鼠每1000个嗜多染红细胞中含1.1 - 1.4个和1.2 - 1.3个微核嗜多染红细胞、每条染色体含0.23 - 0.24个和0.20 - 0.21个姐妹染色单体交换、异常精子分别为3.5 - 5.7%和1.6 - 1.9%。CP在MN和SCE试验中是一种强效遗传毒素,但在SM试验中遗传毒性较弱。在相当剂量下,在MN、SM和SCE试验中,大鼠对CP的敏感性分别比小鼠高约3倍、2.5倍和1.8倍。ST在小鼠的所有试验中产生微弱的遗传毒性反应,而在大鼠中仅在SM和SCE试验中产生反应。在MN和SM试验中,小鼠对ST更敏感,而在SCE试验中难以比较种属差异。对于这两种化合物,三项试验的敏感性从高到低依次为:SCE大于MN远大于SM。对于CP,波顿大鼠和LACA瑞士小鼠的相对反应在质量上与先前的报告相似。尽管使用不同品系可能解释了不同研究中观察到的反应程度差异。大鼠中ST的结果表明,遗传毒性终点的选择可以决定是否能检测到反应。此外,本研究中ST的结果与其他研究结果之间的差异表明,除了使用一系列体内试验外,选择一种以上的品系或物种来全面评估化合物产生DNA损伤的能力可能是谨慎的做法。