• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性腹痛患者血清胰酶检测:一项比较性前瞻性研究。

Serum pancreatic enzyme assays in acute abdomen: a comparative prospective study.

作者信息

Ventrucci M, Pezzilli R, Montone L, Plate L, Buonamici L, Bergami R, Conci T

机构信息

Cattedra di Gastroenterologia, Università di Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Ital J Gastroenterol. 1992 Mar-Apr;24(3):115-8.

PMID:1373336
Abstract

Serum amylase, pancreatic isoamylase, lipase, trypsinogen and elastase-1 were measured in 100 consecutive patients who were emergency admissions to a surgical department, and in 27 selected patients with proven acute pancreatitis who served as controls. The final diagnoses in the 100 patients of the study group were: acute pancreatitis in eight patients, other digestive diseases in 87, and urogenital tract diseases in five. In the control group, pancreas-specific enzymes were abnormally high in all patients and amylase in 26 out of 27. In the study group, all enzymes were markedly high in all eight patients with acute pancreatitis. In the remaining 92 patients, serum amylase was abnormally high in seven, and at least one pancreatic enzyme was elevated in 16. These elevations were generally mild. The diagnostic efficiency, i.e., the percentage of patients correctly classified, was 96% for pancreatic isoamylase and lipase, 93% for amylase, 91% for elastase-1, and 84% for trypsinogen. We conclude that serum lipase turbidimetric assay is the most suitable test for emergency diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, because it is highly sensitive and specific and simply and quickly performed.

摘要

对100名连续入住外科的急诊患者以及27名经证实患有急性胰腺炎的选定患者(作为对照)测定了血清淀粉酶、胰腺同工淀粉酶、脂肪酶、胰蛋白酶原和弹性蛋白酶-1。研究组100名患者的最终诊断结果为:8例急性胰腺炎,87例其他消化系统疾病,5例泌尿生殖道疾病。对照组中,所有患者的胰腺特异性酶均异常升高,27例中有26例淀粉酶异常升高。研究组中,8例急性胰腺炎患者的所有酶均显著升高。其余92例患者中,7例血清淀粉酶异常升高,16例至少有一种胰腺酶升高。这些升高通常较轻。胰腺同工淀粉酶和脂肪酶的诊断效率(即正确分类患者的百分比)为96%,淀粉酶为93%,弹性蛋白酶-1为91%,胰蛋白酶原为84%。我们得出结论,血清脂肪酶比浊法是急性胰腺炎急诊诊断最适合的检测方法,因为它高度敏感、特异,且操作简单快速。

相似文献

1
Serum pancreatic enzyme assays in acute abdomen: a comparative prospective study.急性腹痛患者血清胰酶检测:一项比较性前瞻性研究。
Ital J Gastroenterol. 1992 Mar-Apr;24(3):115-8.
2
Clinical value of serum pancreatic enzymes in acute alcohol intoxication and acute alcoholic pancreatitis.血清胰酶在急性酒精中毒和急性酒精性胰腺炎中的临床价值
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Apr;29(2):174-8.
3
Determination of elastase-1 serum levels in post ERCP/EST pancreatic damage.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术/内镜下括约肌切开术后胰腺损伤时弹性蛋白酶-1血清水平的测定
Z Gastroenterol. 1999 Aug;37(8):701-5.
4
[Serum pancreatic enzymes in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the pancreas].
G Ital Oncol. 1989 Jan-Mar;9(1):7-13.
5
Clinical evaluation of a new rapid assay for serum lipase determination.
Ital J Gastroenterol. 1994 Apr;26(3):132-6.
6
Serum amylase and lipase in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain.血清淀粉酶和脂肪酶在急性腹痛评估中的应用
Am Surg. 1996 Dec;62(12):1028-33.
7
Comparison of urine trypsinogen-2 test strip with serum lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.尿胰蛋白酶原-2检测试纸条与血清脂肪酶在急性胰腺炎诊断中的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jul-Aug;49(46):1130-4.
8
Serum pancreatic enzyme behavior during the course of acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎病程中血清胰腺酶的变化情况
Pancreas. 1987;2(5):506-9. doi: 10.1097/00006676-198709000-00003.
9
[Diagnostic value of various laboratory parameters in acute pancreatitis].[各种实验室参数在急性胰腺炎中的诊断价值]
Z Gastroenterol. 1990 Apr;28(4):198-201.
10
Comparison of elastase-1 with amylase, lipase, and trypsin-like immunoreactivity in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.弹性蛋白酶-1与淀粉酶、脂肪酶及胰蛋白酶样免疫反应性在急性胰腺炎诊断中的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 1987 Jun;82(6):532-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Serum amylase and lipase and urinary trypsinogen and amylase for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶以及尿胰蛋白酶原和淀粉酶用于急性胰腺炎的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD012010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012010.pub2.