McDonald S
Department of Neuropsychology, Lidcombe Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Brain Inj. 1992 May-Jun;6(3):283-92. doi: 10.3109/02699059209029670.
In this paper communication disorders following closed head injury are described and various forms of language assessment techniques are reviewed. The usefulness of conventional, pragmatic and cognitive approaches is considered. A new cognitive-pragmatic approach is then advocated which is an amalgam of the last two approaches. From the examples given it is argued that such an approach is practical in terms of: 1) incorporating knowledge of co-existing cognitive deficits; and 2) focusing on normal everyday communication practices. It is also suggested that the use of a cognitive-pragmatic framework has potential in refining remediation and management strategies with the closed-head-injured population.
本文描述了闭合性颅脑损伤后的交流障碍，并综述了各种语言评估技术的形式。文中考虑了传统、语用和认知方法的实用性。随后提倡一种新的认知语用方法，它是后两种方法的融合。从所举的例子来看，有人认为这种方法在以下方面是切实可行的：1）纳入共存认知缺陷的知识；2）关注正常的日常交流实践。还有人指出，使用认知语用框架在完善针对闭合性颅脑损伤患者的康复和管理策略方面具有潜力。
