• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊拉地平缓释制剂每日一次给药与标准制剂每日两次给药的临床等效性。多中心研究组。

Clinical equivalence of once-daily administration of a modified-release formulation of isradipine and twice-daily administration of the standard formulation. Multicentre Study Group.

作者信息

Holmes D, Moullet C

机构信息

Clinical Research Department, Sandoz Pharma Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19 Suppl 3:S61-5.

PMID:1376839
Abstract

In a double-blind, parallel-group comparative study, once-daily administration of a modified-release formulation of isradipine (Im, n = 189) was compared with twice-daily administration of the standard formulation (Is, n = 191). Following a 3- to 5-week placebo period, patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (sDBP) of greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg but less than or equal to 120 mm Hg were randomized to receive either Im at 5 mg once daily or Is at 2.5 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. A double-dummy technique was used to maintain blindness and no dosage titration was made. Blood pressure was always recorded in the morning before drug administration (12 h after the previous administration of Is or 24 h after the previous administration of Im). The mean sDBP was reduced significantly (p less than 0.001) and equally in both groups, and the normalization rate (sDBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) was 54% with Im and 55% with Is. Adverse events were slightly less frequent overall in the patients receiving Im than Is (23 vs. 28%, respectively) as was the incidence of typical dihydropyridine side effects such as flushing and headache. The results show that once-daily administration of 5 mg of Im is as effective and better tolerated than 2.5 mg twice daily of Is while providing adequate blood pressure control at the end of the 24-h dosing interval.

摘要

在一项双盲、平行组比较研究中,将一日一次服用的氨氯地平缓释制剂(Im,n = 189)与一日两次服用的标准制剂(Is,n = 191)进行比较。在3至5周的安慰剂期后,坐位舒张压(sDBP)大于或等于100 mmHg但小于或等于120 mmHg的患者被随机分配,接受每日一次5 mg的Im或每日两次2.5 mg的Is治疗6周。采用双模拟技术维持盲法,且未进行剂量滴定。血压总是在早晨给药前(上次服用Is后12小时或上次服用Im后24小时)记录。两组患者的平均sDBP均显著降低(p < 0.001)且降低程度相同,Im组的血压正常化率(sDBP小于或等于90 mmHg)为54%,Is组为55%。接受Im治疗的患者总体不良事件发生率略低于接受Is治疗的患者(分别为23%和28%),潮红和头痛等典型二氢吡啶类副作用的发生率也是如此。结果表明,每日一次服用5 mg的Im与每日两次服用2.5 mg的Is疗效相当,但耐受性更好,同时在24小时给药间隔结束时能提供充分的血压控制。

相似文献

1
Clinical equivalence of once-daily administration of a modified-release formulation of isradipine and twice-daily administration of the standard formulation. Multicentre Study Group.伊拉地平缓释制剂每日一次给药与标准制剂每日两次给药的临床等效性。多中心研究组。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19 Suppl 3:S61-5.
2
[Efficacy and safety of long-acting carteolol 1% once daily. A double-masked, randomized study].[1%长效卡替洛尔每日一次的疗效与安全性。一项双盲随机研究]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 Feb;26(2):131-6.
3
First clinical experience with isradipine in the treatment of hypertension in Portugal.伊拉地平在葡萄牙治疗高血压的首次临床经验。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;18 Suppl 3:S4-6.
4
A randomized comparison of isradipine slow release given once daily with isradipine twice daily on 24 hour blood pressure in hypertensive patients.一项关于高血压患者每日一次服用缓释伊拉地平与每日两次服用伊拉地平对24小时血压影响的随机对照研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Apr;5(2):121-7.
5
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
6
A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of lacidipine with atenolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. The United Kingdom Lacidipine Study Group.拉西地平与阿替洛尔治疗原发性高血压的疗效及安全性双盲比较。英国拉西地平研究组。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 4:S27-30.
7
Clinical efficacy and tolerability of isradipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in young and elderly patients.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19 Suppl 3:S53-7.
8
Evaluation of isradipine and captopril alone or in combination for the treatment of hypertension.评估伊拉地平与卡托普利单独或联合使用治疗高血压的效果。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;18 Suppl 3:S12-4.
9
Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.一项三期、为期8周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估坎地沙坦酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1924-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.018.
10
Does isradipine exert a special early-morning blood pressure-lowering effect?伊拉地平是否具有特殊的清晨降压作用?
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19 Suppl 3:S74-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache.预防偏头痛药物的比较有效性荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0130733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130733. eCollection 2015.
2
At equipotent doses, isradipine is better tolerated than amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.在等效剂量下,对于轻至中度高血压患者,伊拉地平的耐受性优于氨氯地平:一项双盲、随机、平行组研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Oct;38(4):335-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04363.x.
3
Isradipine. An update of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.
伊拉地平。其药效学、药代动力学特性及治疗轻至中度高血压疗效的最新进展。
Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):618-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00009.