Bosari S, Lee A K, DeLellis R A, Wiley B D, Heatley G J, Silverman M L
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805.
Hum Pathol. 1992 Jul;23(7):755-61. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90344-3.
The prognostic significance of microvessel quantitation in invasive breast carcinoma was analyzed in a study group that comprised 88 patients with axillary node-negative carcinoma and 32 patients with axillary node-positive carcinoma who had a minimum follow-up period of 9 years. Microvessels were identified by immunohistochemistry using antibodies to endothelial markers, including factor VIII-related antigen and blood group isoantigens (ABH). Factor VIII-related antigen staining provided more consistent results for microvessel quantitation than did staining for ABH isoantigens. The three most vascular areas within a tumor were selected, and the microvessels within a x200 microscopic field of each area were counted by two investigators simultaneously. Node-positive carcinomas demonstrated significantly higher microvessel counts than did node-negative carcinomas (mean +/- SD, 99 +/- 42 and 73 +/- 22, respectively; P less than .001). In node-negative carcinomas, tumors from patients who experienced distant recurrence had higher microvessel counts than did tumors from patients who were disease-free (84 +/- 19 and 70 +/- 22; P = .01). Similarly, in patients with node-positive carcinoma, microvessel counts were considerably higher in tumors from patients who experienced distant recurrence than in patients who did not, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (113 +/- 44 and 93 +/- 34, respectively). Among patients with node-negative carcinoma, those with a microvessel count of less than 84 had a recurrence rate of 20% compared with 57% in patients with counts greater than 84 (P = .003). Microvessel counts were independent of histologic parameters, ploidy status, and S-phase fraction but correlated with peritumoral vascular invasion. Both microvessel counts and vascular invasion were independent prognostic parameters by multivariate analysis. High vessel counts may represent increased tumor angiogenesis and are correlated with tumor aggressiveness. Microvessel quantitation may be an additional prognostic factor that, when used in conjunction with more established parameters, can help in appropriate patient management.
在一个研究组中分析了微血管定量在浸润性乳腺癌中的预后意义,该研究组包括88例腋窝淋巴结阴性癌患者和32例腋窝淋巴结阳性癌患者,其最短随访期为9年。通过免疫组织化学使用针对内皮标志物的抗体来识别微血管,这些标志物包括因子VIII相关抗原和血型同种抗原(ABH)。与ABH同种抗原染色相比,因子VIII相关抗原染色为微血管定量提供了更一致的结果。选择肿瘤内三个血管最丰富的区域,由两名研究人员同时对每个区域的200倍显微镜视野内的微血管进行计数。淋巴结阳性癌的微血管计数明显高于淋巴结阴性癌(平均±标准差,分别为99±42和73±22;P<0.001)。在淋巴结阴性癌中,发生远处复发患者的肿瘤微血管计数高于无病患者的肿瘤(84±19和70±22;P = 0.01)。同样,在淋巴结阳性癌患者中,发生远处复发患者的肿瘤微血管计数虽高于未复发患者,但差异未达到统计学意义(分别为113±44和93±34)。在淋巴结阴性癌患者中,微血管计数小于84的患者复发率为20%,而计数大于84的患者复发率为57%(P = 0.003)。微血管计数与组织学参数、倍体状态和S期分数无关,但与肿瘤周围血管侵犯相关。通过多变量分析,微血管计数和血管侵犯都是独立的预后参数。高血管计数可能代表肿瘤血管生成增加,并与肿瘤侵袭性相关。微血管定量可能是一个额外的预后因素,当与更成熟的参数结合使用时,有助于对患者进行适当的管理。