Effert P, Ackermann R
Urologische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
Urologe A. 1992 May;31(3):135-41.
The high incidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), together with the wide variability in its clinical manifestations and in the natural course of disease, requires a careful evaluation of the patient. Technical progress and continuing development of established methods mean that a wide range of diagnostic procedures is available and an "objective" correlate of infravesical obstruction can be obtained. In addition to these objective criteria, the patient's subjective perception of the impact of the symptoms on his quality of life also affects the decision as to whether therapeutic intervention should be attempted and the degree of success that can be attained, as is becoming increasingly evident. The diagnostic methods available for the routine assessment of patients with BPH is reviewed, and their relative value as a basis for deciding on therapeutic intervention is analysed.
良性前列腺增生(BPH)的高发病率,以及其临床表现和疾病自然病程的广泛变异性,需要对患者进行仔细评估。技术进步和现有方法的持续发展意味着有多种诊断程序可供使用,并且可以获得膀胱下梗阻的“客观”关联指标。除了这些客观标准外,患者对症状对其生活质量影响的主观感受也会影响是否应尝试进行治疗干预以及可取得的成功程度的决策,这一点日益明显。本文回顾了可用于BPH患者常规评估的诊断方法,并分析了它们作为决定治疗干预依据的相对价值。