Chüden H G, Hoepner H
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1976 Dec;55(12):995-1002.
The detection of recruitment is based on investigating change of loudness with change of intensity. The evaluation and further differential diagnosis of inner ear damage is, for instance, a necessity in an expert opinion of an ENT specialist. Which of the numerous methods of detecting recruitment can be recommended for the specialists practice. Over 215 patients with inner ear damage were tested for recruitment with different test methods. Results showed that SISI tests were performed with more accuracy than differential limen tests. Differences of various recruitment methods of our collective are investigated and advantages and disadvantages discussed. The recommendation for the specialists practice would be to perform 1. the "limits of intensity" (threshold of hearing and loudness discomfort), 2. the supraliminal noise-audiometry Langenbeck and 3. the SISI test. They seem to be most effectful, exact, reproducible and easy to perform test-methods for detecting recruitment.
重振的检测是基于研究响度随强度变化的情况。例如,在内耳损伤的专家意见中,对内耳损伤进行评估和进一步的鉴别诊断是必要的。对于专家实践而言,众多检测重振的方法中哪一种值得推荐呢?超过215例内耳损伤患者采用不同检测方法进行了重振测试。结果显示,短增量敏感指数(SISI)测试比辨别阈测试的准确性更高。我们对研究组中各种重振方法的差异进行了研究,并讨论了其优缺点。对于专家实践的建议是进行:1. “强度极限”(听阈和响度不适阈);2. 阈上噪声测听法(Langenbeck法);3. 短增量敏感指数(SISI)测试。它们似乎是检测重振最有效、准确、可重复且易于实施的测试方法。