Suppr超能文献

[双耳平衡测试的比较(作者译)]

[The comparison of binaural balance-tests (author's transl)].

作者信息

Fritze W

出版信息

Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1977 Jun 30;217(1):81-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00453893.

Abstract

14 normal-hearing persons were examined in 7 different versions of the balance-test. Thereby a severe dependence to the methods was found out, caused by psychological factors. By randomization of the side and the intensity (computer-controlled test-procedure) no case showed a significant recruitment. In 23 persons with inner-ear disturbance there was not only the randomized test performed, but also the methods of Jerger (keeping the intensity constant on the worse ear) and Hood (constant on the better ear). By using the randomized test all patients showed a significant recruitment, calculated as the deviation of the angle in relation to the diagonal of the diagram. In 7 cases the method of Jerger and in 20 of all the 23 persons the method of Hood brought a compensation of loudness.

摘要

14名听力正常的人接受了7种不同版本的平衡测试。结果发现,由于心理因素,测试结果严重依赖测试方法。通过对测试侧和强度进行随机化处理(计算机控制的测试程序),没有病例显示出明显的重振现象。23名内耳功能障碍患者不仅接受了随机化测试,还接受了耶格测试法(患耳强度保持恒定)和胡德测试法(健耳强度保持恒定)。使用随机化测试时,所有患者均显示出明显的重振现象,重振程度通过图表对角线角度偏差计算得出。在7例患者中,耶格测试法呈现出响度补偿,在23例患者中的20例中,胡德测试法呈现出响度补偿。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验