Suppr超能文献

大鼠和小鼠脑室内注射软骨藻酸后的毒性:与兴奋性氨基酸激动剂的比较。

Domoic acid toxicity in rats and mice after intracerebroventricular administration: comparison with excitatory amino acid agonists.

作者信息

Chiamulera C, Costa S, Valerio E, Reggiani A

机构信息

Glaxo Research Laboratories, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992 Feb;70(2):115-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1992.tb00439.x.

Abstract

A behavioural study of the domoic acid (DOM)-induced convulsive behaviour after intracerebroventricular administration was carried out in rats and mice. DOM-induced behaviours were compared to those elicited by other excitatory amino acid (EAA) agonists N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), alpha-amino-3- hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) and kainic acid (KA), in such a way as to assess the possible similarities between DOM-induced effects and EAA subtype receptor activation in vivo. In rat, DOM (0.03-3 nmol/rat) caused a complex pattern of convulsive behaviour, quantified by means of a 15-point rating scale. DOM-induced behavioural profile was characterized at the lower doses by "preconvulsive" behaviours as wet dog shakes, hypermotility, mild facial clonus. At higher doses, DOM caused clonic convulsions followed by the "status epilepticus" syndrome (wet dog shakes, forelimb clonus, rearing, salivation). Rats treated with KA (0.3-10 nmol/rat) showed an almost identical behavioural profile. AMPA (1-10 nmol/rat)-induced convulsive behaviour was similar to DOM and KA only at the higher doses. NMDA (0.25-10 nmol/rat) caused clonic convulsions but not "status epilepticus". In mice, similar results were obtained: all the tested drugs induced generalized seizures, but only animals treated with DOM, KA and AMPA showed a prolonged sequence of seizures with forelimb clonus. Our results confirm the findings reported in the literature and support the hypothesis that DOM and KA act at the same EAA receptor.

摘要

在大鼠和小鼠中进行了一项关于脑室注射软骨藻酸(DOM)诱导惊厥行为的行为学研究。将DOM诱导的行为与其他兴奋性氨基酸(EAA)激动剂N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)、α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)和 kainic 酸(KA)引发的行为进行比较,以评估DOM诱导的效应与体内EAA亚型受体激活之间可能存在的相似性。在大鼠中,DOM(0.03 - 3 nmol/只大鼠)引起复杂的惊厥行为模式,通过15分评分量表进行量化。DOM诱导的行为特征在较低剂量时表现为“惊厥前”行为,如湿狗样抖动、活动亢进、轻度面部阵挛。在较高剂量时,DOM引起阵挛性惊厥,随后出现“癫痫持续状态”综合征(湿狗样抖动、前肢阵挛、竖毛、流涎)。用KA(0.3 - 10 nmol/只大鼠)处理的大鼠表现出几乎相同的行为特征。AMPA(1 - 10 nmol/只大鼠)诱导的惊厥行为仅在较高剂量时与DOM和KA相似。NMDA(0.25 - 10 nmol/只大鼠)引起阵挛性惊厥,但不引起“癫痫持续状态”。在小鼠中也得到了类似的结果:所有测试药物均诱发全身性惊厥,但只有用DOM、KA和AMPA处理的动物表现出伴有前肢阵挛的长时间惊厥序列。我们的结果证实了文献中报道的发现,并支持DOM和KA作用于相同EAA受体的假说。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验