• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于采用LNH - 84方案治疗的侵袭性淋巴瘤患者,骨髓移植可延长复发后的生存期。

Bone marrow transplantation prolongs survival after relapse in aggressive-lymphoma patients treated with the LNH-84 regimen.

作者信息

Bosly A, Coiffier B, Gisselbrecht C, Tilly H, Auzanneau G, Andrien F, Herbrecht R, Legros M, Devaux Y, Jaubert J

机构信息

Cliniques Universitaires de Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, France.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1992 Oct;10(10):1615-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.10.1615.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1992.10.10.1615
PMID:1383435
Abstract

PURPOSE

Of the 737 patients with aggressive lymphoma who were treated with the LNH-84 regimen, 244 with progressive disease after complete remission or partial response were analyzed retrospectively to determine the influence of intensive chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients were treated with salvage chemotherapy, followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in 40 and allogeneic BMT in four. The other 200 patients were treated with chemotherapy only.

RESULTS

Salvage treatment produced an objective response in 57% of the patients; 23% achieved a second complete remission. Median overall survival was longer for patients who were treated with ABMT than for those who were treated with chemotherapy only (12.4 v 6.7 months), as was median freedom from progression (FFP) survival (7.7 v 4 months). In multiparametric analysis, ABMT and normal initial lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) level were the primary parameters associated with longer survival. This is also true when (1) only patients younger than 60 years of age, (2) only patients who responded to salvage regimen, or (3) only patients with both conditions were included in the analysis. Patients who were not transplanted had a 1.69 to 2.26 relative risk of dying from their disease compared with those who were treated with intensive chemotherapy plus ABMT.

CONCLUSION

This study produced more evidence of the favorable impact of intensive chemotherapy with bone marrow rescue on survival in lymphoma patients who had relapsed.

摘要

目的

在接受LNH - 84方案治疗的737例侵袭性淋巴瘤患者中,对244例在完全缓解或部分缓解后出现疾病进展的患者进行回顾性分析,以确定强化化疗联合骨髓移植(BMT)对生存的影响。

患者与方法

44例患者接受挽救性化疗,其中40例随后接受自体骨髓移植(ABMT),4例接受异基因BMT。另外200例患者仅接受化疗。

结果

挽救性治疗使57%的患者出现客观缓解;23%的患者实现第二次完全缓解。接受ABMT治疗的患者的中位总生存期长于仅接受化疗的患者(12.4个月对6.7个月),无进展生存期(FFP)的中位数也是如此(7.7个月对4个月)。在多参数分析中,ABMT和初始乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平正常是与较长生存期相关的主要参数。当(1)仅纳入年龄小于60岁的患者、(2)仅纳入对挽救方案有反应的患者或(3)仅纳入同时具备这两种情况的患者进行分析时,情况也是如此。与接受强化化疗加ABMT治疗的患者相比,未接受移植的患者死于疾病的相对风险为1.69至2.26。

结论

本研究进一步证明了骨髓挽救的强化化疗对复发淋巴瘤患者生存的有利影响。

相似文献

1
Bone marrow transplantation prolongs survival after relapse in aggressive-lymphoma patients treated with the LNH-84 regimen.对于采用LNH - 84方案治疗的侵袭性淋巴瘤患者,骨髓移植可延长复发后的生存期。
J Clin Oncol. 1992 Oct;10(10):1615-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.10.1615.
2
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.
3
Prognostic factors in aggressive malignant lymphomas: description and validation of a prognostic index that could identify patients requiring a more intensive therapy. The Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Agressifs.侵袭性恶性淋巴瘤的预后因素:一种可识别需要更强化治疗患者的预后指数的描述与验证。侵袭性淋巴瘤研究组。
J Clin Oncol. 1991 Feb;9(2):211-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.2.211.
4
Aggressive primary gastrointestinal lymphomas: review of 91 patients treated with the LNH-84 regimen. A study of the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Agressifs.
Am J Med. 1991 Jan;90(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90509-v.
5
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation versus dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with partial response to front-line chemotherapy: a prospective randomized italian multicenter study.高剂量化疗后自体骨髓移植与地塞米松、顺铂和阿糖胞苷用于对一线化疗部分缓解的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:一项前瞻性随机意大利多中心研究
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Feb;14(2):534-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.534.
6
Salvage therapy with ProMACE-MOPP followed by intensive chemoradiotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who failed to respond to first-line CHOP.对于一线CHOP治疗无效的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,采用ProMACE-MOPP挽救疗法,随后进行强化放化疗和自体骨髓移植。
J Clin Oncol. 1992 Dec;10(12):1949-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1949.
7
LNH-84 regimen: a multicenter study of intensive chemotherapy in 737 patients with aggressive malignant lymphoma.
J Clin Oncol. 1989 Aug;7(8):1018-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.8.1018.
8
High-dose chemoradiotherapy and anti-B-cell monoclonal antibody-purged autologous bone marrow transplantation in mantle-cell lymphoma: no evidence for long-term remission.大剂量放化疗及抗B细胞单克隆抗体清除的自体骨髓移植治疗套细胞淋巴瘤:无长期缓解证据
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):13-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.13.
9
'Relative' chemotherapy sensitivity: the impact of number of salvage regimens prior to autologous stem cell transplant for relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.“相对”化疗敏感性:自体干细胞移植前挽救方案数量对复发难治性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的影响
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002 Dec;30(12):885-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703772.
10
Comparison of autologous bone marrow transplantation with sequential chemotherapy for intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in first complete remission: a study of 464 patients. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.自体骨髓移植与序贯化疗治疗首次完全缓解的中高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较:464例患者的研究。成人淋巴瘤研究组。
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;12(12):2543-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2543.

引用本文的文献

1
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for DLBCL: a report from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation on more than 40,000 patients over 32 years.造血干细胞移植治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会 32 年超过 40000 例患者的报告。
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Jul 5;14(1):106. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01085-9.
2
Novel conditioning regimen in upfront autologous stem cell transplantation in high-risk DLBCL.高危弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤一线自体干细胞移植中的新型预处理方案
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Oct;57(10):1612-1614. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01766-8. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Ibrutinib Associated with Rituximab-Platinum Salt-Based Immunochemotherapy in B-Cell Lymphomas: Results of a Phase 1b-II Study of the LYSA Group.
伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗-铂盐为基础的免疫化疗用于B细胞淋巴瘤:LYSA组1b-II期研究结果
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;14(7):1761. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071761.
4
Treating Metastatic Brain Cancers With Stem Cells.用干细胞治疗转移性脑癌。
Front Mol Neurosci. 2021 Nov 24;14:749716. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2021.749716. eCollection 2021.
5
Multiple infusions of CD20-targeted T cells and low-dose IL-2 after SCT for high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a pilot study.异基因造血干细胞移植后多次输注靶向CD20的T细胞和低剂量白细胞介素-2治疗高危非霍奇金淋巴瘤的一项初步研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Jan;49(1):73-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.133. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
6
CD20-targeted T cells after stem cell transplantation for high risk and refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.异基因造血干细胞移植后靶向 CD20 的 T 细胞治疗高危和难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jun;19(6):925-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
7
Rituximab maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed CD20(+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final analysis of the collaborative trial in relapsed aggressive lymphoma.自体造血干细胞移植后利妥昔单抗维持治疗复发 CD20(+)弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者:复发侵袭性淋巴瘤合作研究的最终分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4462-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.9416. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
8
Second-line treatment paradigms for diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的二线治疗方案。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2009 Sep;11(5):386-93. doi: 10.1007/s11912-009-0052-0.
9
Long-term outcome of follicular low-grade lymphoma. A report of 91 patients.
Ann Hematol. 1993 Jun;66(6):303-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01695972.
10
Update of results of autologous bone marrow transplantation in lymphoma.淋巴瘤自体骨髓移植结果的更新
Med Oncol. 1994;11(2):35-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02988828.