Rao K S, Loeb L A
Neurobiochemistry Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, India.
Mutat Res. 1992 Sep;275(3-6):317-29. doi: 10.1016/0921-8734(92)90035-n.
The usefulness of conducting DNA damage and repair studies in a postmitotic tissue like brain is emphasized. We review studies that use brain as a tissue to test the validity of the DNA damage and repair hypothesis of aging. As far as the accumulation of age dependent DNA damage is concerned, the data appear to overwhelmingly support the hypothesis. However, attempts to demonstrate a decline in DNA repair capacity as a function of age are conflicting and equally divided. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed. It is suggested that assessment of the repair capacity of neurons with respect to a specific type of damage in a specific gene might yield more definitive answers regarding the role of DNA repair potential in the aging process and as a longevity assurance system.
强调了在像大脑这样的有丝分裂后组织中进行DNA损伤和修复研究的实用性。我们回顾了一些将大脑作为组织来检验衰老的DNA损伤和修复假说有效性的研究。就年龄依赖性DNA损伤的积累而言,数据似乎压倒性地支持该假说。然而,关于证明DNA修复能力随年龄下降的尝试,结果相互矛盾且各占一半。讨论了这种差异的可能原因。有人提出,针对特定基因中特定类型损伤评估神经元的修复能力,可能会就DNA修复潜力在衰老过程中的作用以及作为一种寿命保障系统给出更明确的答案。