Laboratory of Molecular Radiobiology and Gerontology, Institute of Biology, Komi Science Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar 167982, Russia.
Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Mar;12(2):661-84. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
Since the first publication on Somatic Mutation Theory of Aging (Szilárd, 1959), a great volume of knowledge in the field has been accumulated. Here we attempted to organize the evidence "for" and "against" the hypothesized causal role of DNA damage and mutation accumulation in aging in light of four Koch-like criteria. They are based on the assumption that some quantitative relationship between the levels of DNA damage/mutations and aging rate should exist, so that (i) the longer-lived individuals or species would have a lower rate of damage than the shorter-lived, and (ii) the interventions that modulate the level of DNA damage and repair capacity should also modulate the rate of aging and longevity and vice versa. The analysis of how the existing data meets the proposed criteria showed that many gaps should still be filled in order to reach a clear-cut conclusion. As a perspective, it seems that the main emphasis in future studies should be put on the role of DNA damage in stem cell aging.
自从衰老的体细胞突变理论(Szilárd,1959)首次发表以来,该领域已经积累了大量的知识。在这里,我们试图根据四个类似于 Koch 的标准,组织关于 DNA 损伤和突变积累在衰老中假设因果作用的证据“支持”和“反对”。它们基于这样的假设,即 DNA 损伤/突变的水平与衰老率之间应该存在某种定量关系,因此(i)寿命较长的个体或物种的损伤率低于寿命较短的个体,(ii)调节 DNA 损伤水平和修复能力的干预措施也应该调节衰老和寿命的速度,反之亦然。对现有数据如何符合提出的标准的分析表明,为了得出明确的结论,仍有许多空白需要填补。从一个角度来看,未来的研究似乎应该主要侧重于 DNA 损伤在干细胞衰老中的作用。