Underwood P A, Dalton B A, Steele J G, Bennett F A, Strike P
Laboratory for Molecular Biology, CSIRO Division of Biomolecular Engineering, Sydney, Australia.
J Cell Sci. 1992 Aug;102 ( Pt 4):833-45. doi: 10.1242/jcs.102.4.833.
A panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to bovine fibronectin (FN) is described which modulates either heparin binding or cell adhesion to FN, or both. A combination of competitive exclusion and binding to proteolytic fragments identified epitopes in the Hep II, Hep III/I and CBF (cell binding fragment) regions of FN. mAb A17, which bound to the CBF region, strongly inhibited the cell adhesion of BHK-21 fibroblasts, primary corneal fibroblasts and endothelial cells, and NM4 mammary adenocarcinoma cells, to FN at mAb concentrations as low as 1 microgram/ml. This mAb was not so effective at inhibiting the adhesion of B16 mouse melanoma cells. Adhesion of B16 cells to FN was more sensitive to inhibition by mAbs binding to Hep II (A2, A9, A32, A35). Of these, A32 and A35 significantly increased the binding of 35S-heparin to FN, whereas A2 and A9 did not affect it. mAbs A2, A9 and A32 showed good binding to HBF, the 40 kDa proteolytic fragment of human FN which contains both Hep II and IIICS (type III connecting segment). These mAbs inhibited B16 cell adhesion to the HBF (heparin binding fragment) by 30-50%, the greatest inhibition being shown by mAb A32. Two synthetic peptides from the HBF, CS1 (peptide 1) from the IIICS region and peptide I from the Hep II region, also inhibited B16 cell adhesion to HBF by approximately 70 and 30%, respectively. These results suggest that maximal cell adhesion to the HBF involves both CS1 and Hep II. The inhibitory effects of the two peptides were linearly additive in combination, whereas the inhibitory mAbs A2, A9 and A32 showed synergistic additive effects with each of the peptides. This points to the existence of an additional important cell binding site in Hep II, other than peptide I. Recent independent evidence for an additional cell binding site in Hep II supports this view. Melanoma cellular receptor(s) for the Hep II region may be cell surface proteoglycans but do not appear to bind to areas of Hep II with high affinity for soluble heparin, as the latter was not an inhibitor of B16 cell adhesion to the HBF. The increased effectiveness of A32 in inhibiting cell adhesion, compared to A2 and A9, may be due to conformational effects which increase the binding of soluble heparin, but reduce affinity for the cellular receptor. These results are discussed in context with other reports in the literature.
本文描述了一组针对牛纤连蛋白(FN)的单克隆抗体(mAb),这些抗体可调节肝素结合或细胞与FN的黏附,或两者皆可调节。通过竞争排斥和与蛋白水解片段结合的组合,确定了FN的Hep II、Hep III/I和CBF(细胞结合片段)区域中的表位。与CBF区域结合的mAb A17在低至1微克/毫升的mAb浓度下,能强烈抑制BHK - 21成纤维细胞、原代角膜成纤维细胞、内皮细胞以及NM4乳腺腺癌细胞与FN的细胞黏附。该mAb在抑制B16小鼠黑色素瘤细胞的黏附方面效果不那么显著。B16细胞与FN的黏附对结合到Hep II的mAb(A2、A9、A32、A35)的抑制更为敏感。其中,A32和A35显著增加了35S - 肝素与FN的结合,而A2和A9则无此影响。mAb A2、A9和A32与HBF(人FN的40 kDa蛋白水解片段,包含Hep II和IIICS(III型连接段))有良好的结合。这些mAb抑制B16细胞与HBF(肝素结合片段)的黏附达30 - 50%,其中mAb A32的抑制作用最强。来自HBF的两种合成肽,IIICS区域的CS1(肽1)和Hep II区域的肽I,也分别抑制B16细胞与HBF的黏附约70%和30%。这些结果表明,细胞与HBF的最大黏附涉及CS1和Hep II两者。两种肽的抑制作用呈线性相加,而抑制性mAb A2、A9和A32与每种肽均显示协同相加作用。这表明在Hep II中除了肽I之外还存在一个额外的重要细胞结合位点。最近关于Hep II中存在额外细胞结合位点的独立证据支持了这一观点。Hep II区域的黑色素瘤细胞受体可能是细胞表面蛋白聚糖,但似乎不与对可溶性肝素具有高亲和力的Hep II区域结合,因为后者不是B16细胞与HBF黏附的抑制剂。与A2和A9相比,A32在抑制细胞黏附方面效果增强,可能是由于构象效应增加了可溶性肝素的结合,但降低了对细胞受体的亲和力。本文结合文献中的其他报道对这些结果进行了讨论。