Fingar A R, Hopkins R S, Nelson M
Department of Family Medicine, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens 45701.
J Occup Med. 1992 Aug;34(8):779-87. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199208000-00011.
In 1987, the Panel on Occupational Safety and Health Statistics issued a report concluding that the existing national surveillance system for occupation injuries might result in substantial underreporting of occupational injuries. In this study, we examined two sources of data on occupational injuries, the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) and lost-work time claims to the Bureau of Workers' Compensation (BWC), available in one community, Athens County, Ohio. Based on comparison of the NEISS and BWC data sets, we conclude that neither data set alone gives a complete nor an accurate picture of occupational injuries in Athens County. The two may provide a more complete representation of occupational injuries when examined together. Using the NEISS and BWC data sets in combination results in a total number of injuries higher than that predicted by national norms.
1987年,职业安全与健康统计小组发布了一份报告,其结论是现有的全国职业伤害监测系统可能导致职业伤害的大量漏报。在本研究中,我们考察了俄亥俄州雅典县一个社区可获取的关于职业伤害的两个数据源,即国家电子伤害监测系统(NEISS)和向工人赔偿局(BWC)提出的误工索赔。基于对NEISS和BWC数据集的比较,我们得出结论,单独任何一个数据集都无法完整、准确地呈现雅典县的职业伤害情况。将两者结合起来考察时,可能会更全面地反映职业伤害情况。将NEISS和BWC数据集结合使用得出的伤害总数高于国家规范预测的数量。