• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[引入长期护理保险后残疾人收入状况的变化]

[Change in the income status of the disabled after introduction of long-term care insurance].

作者信息

Rüdiger D, Seiler D

机构信息

Zentrum für Sozialpolitik, Universität Bremen.

出版信息

Z Gerontol. 1992 May-Jun;25(3):178-85.

PMID:1387273
Abstract

Up to the present time, long-term-care needs in the Federal Republic of Germany have only been covered to a limited extent through health insurance. The needs of the majority of those requiring long-term care must be covered from their pension funds or acquired wealth. This often does not suffice, which results in those needing long-term care becoming recipients of social assistance. The introduction of a long-term-care insurance should bring an end to this situation, which is considered unacceptable. At present, two competing schemes for covering the social risk of long-term care are being discussed: a social security insurance and a private insurance. When comparing the planned benefits under consideration, the social security insurance is more favorable in regards to nursing-home treatment, as well as with at-home care and benefits in kind. The private insurance is more favorable when considering nursing-home treatment and monetary benefits. If the private insurance is adopted, over 31% of those formerly relying on nursing-home care would no longer need social assistance. In the case of social security insurance, almost 46% would no longer require social assistance. Most of the remaining individuals requiring social assistance would be women.

摘要

直到目前,德意志联邦共和国的长期护理需求仅在有限程度上通过医疗保险得到满足。大多数需要长期护理者的需求必须从他们的养老基金或既有财富中支付。这往往并不足够,导致需要长期护理者成为社会救助的领取者。引入长期护理保险应能终结这种被认为不可接受的状况。目前,正在讨论两种相互竞争的应对长期护理社会风险的方案:一种是社会保险,另一种是私人保险。在比较所考虑的计划福利时,社会保险在养老院护理、居家护理和实物福利方面更为有利。在考虑养老院护理和货币福利时,私人保险更为有利。如果采用私人保险,超过31%以前依赖养老院护理的人将不再需要社会救助。在社会保险的情况下,近46%的人将不再需要社会救助。其余大多数需要社会救助的人将是女性。

相似文献

1
[Change in the income status of the disabled after introduction of long-term care insurance].[引入长期护理保险后残疾人收入状况的变化]
Z Gerontol. 1992 May-Jun;25(3):178-85.
2
[Comparison of expertises between long-term care insurance (SGB XI) and the law on ambulatory care for disabled individuals in Berlin (HPG)].[长期护理保险(SGB XI)与柏林残疾人门诊护理法(HPG)之间的专业知识比较]
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Nov;64(11):578-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35522.
3
[Social security in the aged requiring nursing care--a review of status and perspectives].[老年护理社会保障——现状与展望综述]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1985 Feb;24(1):39-46.
4
[The nursing care insurance law].
Gesundheitswesen. 1993 Nov;55(11):607-11.
5
[Eligibility for intensive nursing care. Part 1: Guidelines and current experience].
Fortschr Med. 1992 Jul 10;110(19):351-3.
6
Comparing replacement rates under private and federal retirement systems.比较私人退休制度和联邦退休制度下的替代率。
Soc Secur Bull. 2003;65(1):17-25.
7
["Retirement at age 58"--improvement or deterioration of living status?].["58岁退休”——生活状况是改善还是恶化?]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 1996 Sep-Oct;29(5):339-42.
8
Disabled workers and the indexing of Social Security benefits.残疾工人与社会保障福利指数化
Soc Secur Bull. 2007;67(4):21-50.
9
A "three-legged stool" for financing long-term care. Is it an acceptable approach?长期护理融资的“三条腿凳子”。这是一种可接受的方法吗?
J Case Manag. 1994 Fall;3(3):105-9.
10
Social Security's special minimum benefit.社会保障的特别最低福利。
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):1-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term care insurance and multidimensional poverty of middle-aged and elderly: Evidence from China.长期护理保险与中老年多维贫困:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;11:1100146. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1100146. eCollection 2023.