• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Determining suitability of placement for long-stay psychiatric inpatients.

作者信息

Conning A M, Brownlow J M

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, London, England.

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Jul;43(7):709-12. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.7.709.

DOI:10.1176/ps.43.7.709
PMID:1387629
Abstract

Fifty-three long-stay patients on the back wards of a large psychiatric hospital in London were assessed to determine their suitability for other placements after the hospital was closed. The general and deviant behavior subscales of the REHAB Scale were used in the assessment. A wide range of scores indicated that these patients varied greatly in basic living skills. Associations were investigated between patients' scores and somatic problems, fluctuations in mental state, and adverse reactions to change, which affect patients' ability to live in the community. Of 14 patients whose scores indicated a potential for discharge, two had significant deviant behaviors, seven had fluctuating mental states, and two were known to react adversely to change. Although the REHAB Scale is useful, results show that placement decisions should not be based on scores alone. Flexible services that take into account fluctuations in patients' functioning are required.

摘要

相似文献

1
Determining suitability of placement for long-stay psychiatric inpatients.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Jul;43(7):709-12. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.7.709.
2
Social and living skills of new long-stay hospital patients and new long-term community patients.新入住长期住院患者和新的长期社区患者的社交及生活技能。
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Jun;47(6):619-22. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.6.619.
3
Better off in the community? A 5-year follow up study of long-term psychiatric patients discharged into the community.在社区中生活更好?对出院进入社区的长期精神科患者进行的 5 年随访研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;45(4):469-73. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0086-5. Epub 2009 Jun 20.
4
Residential care in hospital and in the community--quality of care and quality of life.医院及社区中的住院护理——护理质量与生活质量
Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;168(4):448-56. doi: 10.1192/bjp.168.4.448.
5
Replacing the mental hospital. Community provision for a district's chronically psychiatrically disabled in domestic environments?取代精神病院。在家庭环境中为某地区慢性精神残疾者提供社区服务?
Br J Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;158:113-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.158.1.113.
6
Autonomy of long-stay psychiatric inpatients.
Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Aug;40(4):699-705. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006000500021.
7
How important is the assessment of social skills in current long-stay in-patients? An evaluation of clinical response to needs for assessment, treatment, and care in a long-stay psychiatric in-patient population.当前长期住院患者的社交技能评估有多重要?对长期住院精神科患者评估、治疗和护理需求的临床反应评估。
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Apr;162:498-502. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.4.498.
8
Long-term outcome of long-stay psychiatric in-patients considered unsuitable to live in the community. TAPS Project 44.被认为不适宜在社区生活的长期住院精神科患者的长期预后。TAPS项目44。
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;181:428-32. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.5.428.
9
The social disablement of men in hostels for homeless people. II. A comparison with patients from long-stay wards.
Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Jun;166(6):809-12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.6.809.
10
Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services (TAPS) Project 33: prospective follow-up study of long-stay patients discharged from two psychiatric hospitals.精神科服务评估团队(TAPS)项目33:两家精神病医院出院的长期住院患者的前瞻性随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;153(10):1318-24. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.10.1318.